Panesar Sukhmeet S, Ignatowicz Agnieszka M, Donaldson Liam J
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1759-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.027.
The aim of this qualitative study is to better understand the types of error occurring during the management of cardiac arrests that led to a death.
All patient safety incidents involving management of cardiac arrests and resulting in death which were reported to a national patient safety database over a 17-month period were analysed. Structured data from each report were extracted and these together with the free text, were subjected to content analysis which was inductive, with the coding scheme emerged from continuous reading and re-reading of incidents.
There were 30 patient safety incidents involving management of cardiac arrests and resulting in death. The reviewers identified a main shortfall in the management of each cardiac arrest and this resulted in 12 different factors being documented. These were grouped into four themes that highlighted systemic weaknesses: miscommunication involving crash number (4/30, 13%), shortfalls in staff attending the arrest (4/30, 13%), equipment deficits (11/30, 36%), and poor application of knowledge and skills (11/30, 37%).
The factors identified represent serious shortfalls in the quality of response to cardiac arrests resulting in death in hospital. No firm conclusion can be drawn about how many deaths in the study population would have been averted if the emergency had been managed to a high standard. The effective management of cardiac arrests should be considered as one of the markers of safe care within a healthcare organisation.
这项定性研究的目的是更好地了解心脏骤停救治过程中导致死亡的错误类型。
分析了在17个月期间向国家患者安全数据库报告的所有涉及心脏骤停救治并导致死亡的患者安全事件。提取每份报告的结构化数据,并将其与自由文本一起进行内容分析,该分析采用归纳法,编码方案源于对事件的持续阅读和反复阅读。
有30起涉及心脏骤停救治并导致死亡的患者安全事件。评审人员确定了每次心脏骤停救治中的一个主要不足,这导致记录了12个不同因素。这些因素被归纳为四个主题,突出了系统弱点:涉及急救编号的沟通失误(4/30,13%)、参与急救的人员不足(4/30,13%)、设备短缺(11/30,36%)以及知识和技能应用不佳(11/30,37%)。
所确定的因素表明医院中因心脏骤停救治质量严重不足而导致死亡。关于如果按照高标准进行急救,研究人群中有多少死亡可以避免,无法得出确凿结论。心脏骤停的有效救治应被视为医疗机构安全护理的标志之一。