Cortegiani Andrea, Russotto Vincenzo, Montalto Francesca, Iozzo Pasquale, Palmeri Cesira, Raineri Santi Maurizio, Giarratano Antonino
Department of Biopathology, Medical and Forensic Biotechnologies (DIBIMEF), Section of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico "P. Giaccone", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125685. eCollection 2015.
High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is a learning method which has proven effective in medical education for technical and non-technical skills. However, its effectiveness for knowledge acquisition is less validated. We performed a randomized study with the primary aim of investigating whether HFS, in association with frontal lessons, would improve knowledge about advanced life support (ALS), in comparison to frontal lessons only among medical students. The secondary aims were to evaluate the effect of HFS on knowledge acquisition of different sections of ALS and personal knowledge perception. Participants answered a pre-test questionnaire consisting of a subjective (evaluating personal perception of knowledge) and an objective section (measuring level of knowledge) containing 100 questions about algorithms, technical skills, team working/early warning scores/communication strategies according to ALS guidelines. All students participated in 3 frontal lessons before being randomized in group S, undergoing a HFS session, and group C, receiving no further interventions. After 10 days from the end of each intervention, both groups answered a questionnaire (post-test) with the same subjective section but a different objective one. The overall number of correct answers of the post-test was significantly higher in group S (mean 74.1, SD 11.2) than in group C (mean 65.5, SD 14.3), p = 0.0017, 95% C.I. 3.34 - 13.9. A significantly higher number of correct answers was reported in group S than in group C for questions investigating knowledge of algorithms (p = 0.0001; 95% C.I 2.22-5.99) and team working/early warning scores/communication strategies (p = 0.0060; 95% C.I 1.13-6.53). Students in group S showed a significantly higher score in the post-test subjective section (p = 0.0074). A lower proportion of students in group S confirmed their perception of knowledge compared to group C (p = 0.0079). HFS showed a beneficial effect on knowledge of ALS among medical students, especially for notions of algorithms and team working/early warning scores/communication.
高保真模拟(HFS)是一种已被证明在医学教育中对技术和非技术技能有效的学习方法。然而,其在知识获取方面的有效性尚未得到充分验证。我们进行了一项随机研究,主要目的是调查与正面授课相结合的HFS与仅进行正面授课相比,是否能提高医学生对高级生命支持(ALS)的知识水平。次要目的是评估HFS对ALS不同章节知识获取以及个人知识认知的影响。参与者回答了一份预测试问卷,该问卷由主观部分(评估个人知识认知)和客观部分(测量知识水平)组成,包含100个关于根据ALS指南的算法、技术技能、团队协作/早期预警评分/沟通策略的问题。所有学生在被随机分为S组(接受一次HFS课程)和C组(不接受进一步干预)之前,都参加了3次正面授课。在每次干预结束10天后,两组都回答了一份问卷(后测试),问卷的主观部分相同,但客观部分不同。后测试中,S组正确答案的总数(平均74.1,标准差11.2)显著高于C组(平均65.5,标准差14.3),p = 0.0017,95%置信区间3.34 - 13.9。在调查算法知识(p = 0.0001;95%置信区间2.22 - 5.99)以及团队协作/早期预警评分/沟通策略的问题上,S组正确答案的数量显著高于C组(p = 0.0060;95%置信区间1.13 - 6.53)。S组学生在后测试主观部分的得分显著更高(p = 0.0074)。与C组相比,S组中确认自己知识认知的学生比例更低(p = 0.0079)。HFS对医学生的ALS知识显示出有益影响,尤其是在算法概念以及团队协作/早期预警评分/沟通方面。