• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合临床评估和卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法预测卵巢癌。

Combining clinical assessment and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm for the prediction of ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Program in Women's Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.017
PMID:25449569
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

ACOG guidelines for the evaluation of women with a pelvic mass employ a combination of physical exam, imaging, and CA125 to guide physicians in the triage of women to gynecologic oncologists. We studied the use of ROMA with clinical assessment for cancer risk assessment in women with a pelvic mass.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter trial evaluating women with a pelvic mass who had an initial clinical risk assessment (ICRA) performed by a generalist. ROMA scores were calculated and sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were determined for ICRA and ICRA+ROMA.

RESULTS

A total of 461 women were entered into the study. There were 375 benign tumors, 48 EOC, 18 LMP tumors and 20 non-ovarian malignancies. For detection of ovarian cancer alone, ICRA had a sensitivity of 85.4%, a specificity of 84.3%, and a NPV of 97.8%. Adding ROMA to ICRA produced a significant improvement of 8.4% in sensitivity, achieving a sensitivity of 93.8% with a specificity of 67.2% and a NPV of 98.8%. Examination of all malignancies (ovarian & non-ovarian) provided a sensitivity of 89.7% for ROMA+ICRA in comparison to 77.9% for ICRA alone, a significant increase in sensitivity of 11.8%. The NPV also significantly increased from 95.5% to 97.3%. Overall, ROMA detected 13 additional malignancies missed by ICRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive use of ROMA with clinical assessment improves the stratification of women with a pelvic mass into low and high risk groups for ovarian cancer. The combination is particularly effective in ruling out malignant disease.

摘要

目的

ACOG 对盆腔肿块女性的评估指南采用体格检查、影像学和 CA125 的组合来指导医生对妇科肿瘤医生进行女性分诊。我们研究了 ROMA 与临床评估联合用于评估盆腔肿块女性的癌症风险。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心试验,评估了接受普通科医生进行初始临床风险评估 (ICRA) 的盆腔肿块女性。计算了 ROMA 评分,并确定了 ICRA 和 ICRA+ROMA 的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV。

结果

共有 461 名女性入组研究。其中 375 例为良性肿瘤,48 例为 EOC,18 例为 LMP 肿瘤,20 例为非卵巢恶性肿瘤。单独检测卵巢癌时,ICRA 的敏感性为 85.4%,特异性为 84.3%,NPV 为 97.8%。将 ROMA 添加到 ICRA 中可使敏感性显著提高 8.4%,达到 93.8%的敏感性,特异性为 67.2%,NPV 为 98.8%。检查所有恶性肿瘤(卵巢和非卵巢)时,ROMA+ICRA 的敏感性为 89.7%,而 ICRA 单独为 77.9%,敏感性显著提高 11.8%。NPV 也从 95.5%显著提高到 97.3%。总体而言,ROMA 检测到 13 例 ICRA 漏诊的额外恶性肿瘤。

结论

ROMA 联合临床评估辅助用于盆腔肿块女性可将其分层为低风险和高风险卵巢癌组。该组合在排除恶性疾病方面特别有效。

相似文献

1
Combining clinical assessment and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm for the prediction of ovarian cancer.结合临床评估和卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法预测卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
2
Assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm for the conservative management of women with a pelvic mass.评估用于盆腔肿块女性保守治疗的卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.基于超声的预测模型(LR2)与卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA)在评估附件包块女性恶性肿瘤风险中的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May;129(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
4
Comparing the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA): Two equivalent ways to differentiate malignant from benign ovarian tumors before surgery?比较哥本哈根指数(CPH-I)和卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA):在手术前区分良恶性卵巢肿瘤的两种等效方法?
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):481-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Development of a multimarker assay for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic masses.开发一种多标志物检测方法用于鉴别诊断良恶性盆腔包块。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Feb 2;440:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
6
Significance of adding progesterone to the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm for early stage ovarian cancer detection in patients with a pelvic mass: A single-center case-control study.在盆腔肿块患者早期卵巢癌检测中,将孕酮添加到卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法中的意义:一项单中心病例对照研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):766-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.006.
7
A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - An international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass.一种结合人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、癌抗原125(CA125)和年龄的新型诊断指标可能改善疑似卵巢癌女性的分诊——一项针对有卵巢肿物女性的国际多中心研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):640-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Combining a symptom index, CA125 and HE4 (triple screen) to detect ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass.联合症状指数、CA125 和 HE4(三联筛查)检测盆腔肿块女性的卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses.超声主观评估优于肿瘤恶性风险指数(RMI)或卵巢恶性肿瘤算法(ROMA),可用于鉴别附件良恶性肿块。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1649-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Validation of a second-generation multivariate index assay for malignancy risk of adnexal masses.附件包块良恶性风险第二代多变量指数检测方法的验证。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):82.e1-82.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Base rate of ovarian cancer on algorithms in patients with a pelvic mass.盆腔包块患者算法的卵巢癌基础率。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1775-1779. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001416. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Multiple biomarker algorithms to predict epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass: Can additional makers improve performance?多种生物标志物算法预测盆腔肿块女性的上皮性卵巢癌:是否有额外的标志物可以改善性能?
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
3
Simple laboratory score improves the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal mass.
简易实验室评分可改善附件包块的术前诊断。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):4343-9. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4280-7. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
Assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm for the conservative management of women with a pelvic mass.评估用于盆腔肿块女性保守治疗的卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 11.