• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multiple biomarker algorithms to predict epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass: Can additional makers improve performance?多种生物标志物算法预测盆腔肿块女性的上皮性卵巢癌:是否有额外的标志物可以改善性能?
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
A multiplex biomarker assay improves the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian tumor patients.一种多重生物标志物检测方法提高了 HE4 和 CA125 在卵巢肿瘤患者中的诊断性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 19;15(10):e0240418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240418. eCollection 2020.
3
Diagnostic measures comparison for ovarian malignancy risk in Epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a meta-analysis.上皮性卵巢癌患者卵巢恶性肿瘤风险的诊断措施比较:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 27;11(1):17308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96552-9.
4
Significance of Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 and Cancer Antigen 125 in Distinguishing Type I and Type II Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.血清人附睾蛋白 4 和癌抗原 125 在鉴别Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型上皮性卵巢癌中的意义。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jul;28(6):1058-1065. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001277.
5
The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful?ROMA(卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法)用于评估有盆腔肿块表现的女性患上皮性卵巢癌的风险:它真的有用吗?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Mar;49(3):521-5. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
6
HE4, CA125, the Risk of Malignancy Algorithm and the Risk of Malignancy Index and complex pelvic masses - a prospective comparison in the pre-operative evaluation of pelvic masses in an Australian population.人附睾蛋白4、癌抗原125、恶性风险算法和恶性风险指数与复杂盆腔肿块——澳大利亚人群盆腔肿块术前评估中的前瞻性比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;55(5):493-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12363. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Does risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm excel human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 in predicting epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法是否优于人附睾蛋白 4 和 CA125 预测上皮性卵巢癌:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jun 19;12:258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-258.
8
CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages.CPH-I 和 HE4 在鉴别早期交界性卵巢肿瘤与上皮性卵巢癌方面优于 CA125。
Dis Markers. 2019 Oct 13;2019:6241743. doi: 10.1155/2019/6241743. eCollection 2019.
9
[Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, human epididymis protein 4, ROMA, and CPH-I for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in Chinese patients with ovarian mass].血清癌抗原125、人附睾蛋白4、ROMA及CPH-I在中国卵巢肿物患者中诊断卵巢癌的比较
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019 Dec 30;39(12):1393-1401. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.12.02.
10
Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: correlation with pathological outcome.HE4、CA125 和 ROMA 算法在盆腔肿块女性中的比较:与病理结果的相关性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Future theranostic strategies: emerging ovarian cancer biomarkers to bridge the gap between diagnosis and treatment.未来的诊疗策略:新兴的卵巢癌生物标志物以弥合诊断与治疗之间的差距。
Front Drug Deliv. 2024 Feb 1;4:1339936. doi: 10.3389/fddev.2024.1339936. eCollection 2024.
2
Knowledge and application of sonographic scoring models for ovarian cancer management among gynecologists in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯妇科医生对卵巢癌管理的超声评分模型的知识与应用:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2025 Jul 29;13:e19746. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19746. eCollection 2025.
3
Machine-learning diagnostic models for ovarian tumors.用于卵巢肿瘤的机器学习诊断模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 1;10(19):e36994. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36994. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
4
Development of prediction model to estimate future risk of ovarian lesions: A multi-center retrospective study.卵巢病变未来风险预测模型的开发:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 23;35:102296. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102296. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Clinical Significance of the Combination of Serum HE4 Levels, Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio, and CT Imaging for the Pretreatment Assessment of Adnexal Masses.血清HE4水平、血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值及CT成像联合用于附件包块预处理评估的临床意义
J Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;14(4):600-610. doi: 10.7150/jca.81174. eCollection 2023.
6
Circulating Biomarkers for Cancer Detection: Could Salivary microRNAs Be an Opportunity for Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics?用于癌症检测的循环生物标志物:唾液微小RNA能否成为卵巢癌诊断的契机?
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 21;11(3):652. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030652.
7
Proteomic analysis of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer identifies CHI3L1 upregulation in association with dysfunction of the sodium-iodine symporter.放射性碘难治性分化型甲状腺癌的蛋白质组学分析确定了几丁质酶3样蛋白1(CHI3L1)的上调与钠碘同向转运体功能障碍相关。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Dec 7;25(1):36. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13622. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Machine Learning analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer proteomic dataset reveals novel candidate biomarkers.机器学习分析高级别浆液性卵巢癌蛋白质组数据集揭示新的候选生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 23;12(1):3041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06788-2.
9
Urinary biomarkers for the detection of ovarian cancer: a systematic review.用于卵巢癌检测的尿生物标志物:系统评价。
Carcinogenesis. 2022 May 19;43(4):311-320. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgac016.
10
Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors.HE4、CA125、ROMA和CPH-I用于附件肿瘤术前评估的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 17;12(1):226. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010226.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Validation of a Novel Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.用于检测卵巢癌的新型生物标志物组合的验证
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep;25(9):1333-40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1299. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
3
Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.循环游离DNA作为卵巢癌的诊断标志物:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0155495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155495. eCollection 2016.
4
Combining clinical assessment and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm for the prediction of ovarian cancer.结合临床评估和卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法预测卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
5
Clinical performance of two multi-marker blood tests for predicting malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.两种多标志物血液检测对附件包块女性恶性肿瘤预测的临床性能
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Jan 1;438:358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
6
Prognostic analysis of invasive circulating tumor cells (iCTCs) in epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌中侵袭性循环肿瘤细胞(iCTCs)的预后分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Sep;134(3):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Simple enrichment and analysis of plasma lysophosphatidic acids.简单的血浆溶血磷脂酸的富集和分析。
Analyst. 2013 Nov 21;138(22):6852-9. doi: 10.1039/c3an01168b.
8
Ovarian malignancy risk stratification of the adnexal mass using a multivariate index assay.采用多变量指数检测对附件包块的卵巢恶性肿瘤风险进行分层。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.022. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
9
Ten years' experience with centralized surgery of ovarian cancer in one health region in Norway.挪威一个卫生区域卵巢癌集中手术 10 年的经验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Feb;22(2):226-31. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823589ef.
10
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass.评估盆腔包块患者中卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法的诊断准确性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):280-288. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318224fce2.

多种生物标志物算法预测盆腔肿块女性的上皮性卵巢癌:是否有额外的标志物可以改善性能?

Multiple biomarker algorithms to predict epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass: Can additional makers improve performance?

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA; Center for Biomarkers and Emerging Technologies, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, RI 02905, USA; Program in Women's Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, RI 02905, USA.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.006
PMID:30992143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6666425/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Management of a woman with a pelvic mass is complicated by difficulty in discriminating malignant from benign disease. Many serum biomarkers have been examined to determine their sensitivity for detecting malignancy. This study was designed to evaluate if the addition of biomarkers to HE4 and CA125, as used in the Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), can improve the detection of EOC.

METHODS

This was an IRB approved, prospective clinical trial examining serum obtained from women diagnosed with a pelvic mass who subsequently underwent surgery. Serum biomarker levels for CA125, HE4, YKL-40, transthyretin, ApoA1, Beta-2-microglobulin, transferrin, and LPA were measured. Logistic regression analysis was performed for various marker combinations, ROC curves were generated, and the area under the curves (AUCs) were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 56 years (Range 20-91). Final pathology revealed there were 103 (56.0%) benign tumors, 4 (2.2%) LMP tumors, 61 EOC (33.1%), 2 (1.1%) non-EOC ovarian cancers, 6 (3.3%) gynecologic cancers with metastasis to the ovary and 8 (4.3%) non-gynecologic cancers with metastasis to the ovary. The combination of HE4 and CA125 (i.e. ROMA) achieved an AUC of 91.2% (95% CI: 86.0-96.4) for the detection of EOC vs benign disease. The combination of CA125, HE4, YKL-40, transthyretin, ApoA1, Beta 2 microglobulin, transferrin, LPA and menopausal status achieved the highest AUC of 94.6% (95% CI: 90.1-99.2) but this combination was not significantly better than the HE4 and CA125 combination alone (p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of select further serum biomarkers to HE4 and CA125 does not add to the performance of the dual marker combination for the detection of ovarian cancer.

摘要

简介

由于难以区分良性和恶性疾病,因此对患有盆腔肿块的女性的管理变得复杂。已经检查了许多血清生物标志物来确定其对恶性肿瘤的检测敏感性。本研究旨在评估将 HE4 和 CA125 与用于恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA)的生物标志物联合使用是否可以提高对 EOC 的检测。

方法

这是一项经过 IRB 批准的前瞻性临床试验,检查了随后接受手术的被诊断为盆腔肿块的女性获得的血清。测量了 CA125、HE4、YKL-40、转甲状腺素、ApoA1、β-2-微球蛋白、转铁蛋白和 LPA 的血清生物标志物水平。对各种标志物组合进行逻辑回归分析,生成 ROC 曲线,并确定曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

共有 184 名符合纳入标准的患者,中位年龄为 56 岁(范围 20-91)。最终病理学显示有 103 例(56.0%)良性肿瘤,4 例(2.2%)低度恶性潜能肿瘤,61 例 EOC(33.1%),2 例(1.1%)非 EOC 卵巢癌,6 例(3.3%)妇科癌症伴卵巢转移,8 例(4.3%)非妇科癌症伴卵巢转移。HE4 和 CA125 的组合(即 ROMA)对 EOC 与良性疾病的检测的 AUC 为 91.2%(95%CI:86.0-96.4)。CA125、HE4、YKL-40、转甲状腺素、ApoA1、β-2 微球蛋白、转铁蛋白、LPA 和绝经状态的组合获得了最高的 AUC 为 94.6%(95%CI:90.1-99.2),但与单独使用 HE4 和 CA125 相比,该组合并没有显著更好(p=0.078)。

结论

将特定的其他血清生物标志物添加到 HE4 和 CA125 中不会提高双标志物组合对卵巢癌的检测性能。