• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将物种树分析应用于深层系统发育历史:基于实证系统发育研究调查提出的挑战与潜力

Applying species-tree analyses to deep phylogenetic histories: challenges and potential suggested from a survey of empirical phylogenetic studies.

作者信息

Lanier Hayley C, Knowles L Lacey

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA.

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA.

出版信息

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Feb;83:191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.022. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.022
PMID:25450097
Abstract

Coalescent-based methods for species-tree estimation are becoming a dominant approach for reconstructing species histories from multi-locus data, with most of the studies examining these methodologies focused on recently diverged species. However, deeper phylogenies, such as the datasets that comprise many Tree of Life (ToL) studies, also exhibit gene-tree discordance. This discord may also arise from the stochastic sorting of gene lineages during the speciation process (i.e., reflecting the random coalescence of gene lineages in ancestral populations). It remains unknown whether guidelines regarding methodologies and numbers of loci established by simulation studies at shallow tree depths translate into accurate species relationships for deeper phylogenetic histories. We address this knowledge gap and specifically identify the challenges and limitations of species-tree methods that account for coalescent variance for deeper phylogenies. Using simulated data with characteristics informed by empirical studies, we evaluate both the accuracy of estimated species trees and the characteristics associated with recalcitrant nodes, with a specific focus on whether coalescent variance is generally responsible for the lack of resolution. By determining the proportion of coalescent genealogies that support a particular node, we demonstrate that (1) species-tree methods account for coalescent variance at deep nodes and (2) mutational variance - not gene-tree discord arising from the coalescent - posed the primary challenge for accurate reconstruction across the tree. For example, many nodes were accurately resolved despite predicted discord from the random coalescence of gene lineages and nodes with poor support were distributed across a range of depths (i.e., they were not restricted to a particular recent divergences). Given their broad taxonomic scope and large sampling of taxa, deep level phylogenies pose several potential methodological complications including difficulties with MCMC convergence and estimation of requisite population genetic parameters for coalescent-based approaches. Despite these difficulties, the findings generally support the utility of species-tree analyses for the estimation of species relationships throughout the ToL. We discuss strategies for successful application of species-tree approaches to deep phylogenies.

摘要

基于溯祖理论的物种树估计方法正成为从多位点数据重建物种历史的主导方法,大多数研究这些方法的研究都集中在最近分化的物种上。然而,更深层次的系统发育,例如许多生命之树(ToL)研究中的数据集,也表现出基因树不一致。这种不一致也可能源于物种形成过程中基因谱系的随机分选(即反映祖先种群中基因谱系的随机合并)。尚不清楚浅树深度模拟研究建立的关于方法和基因座数量的指导方针是否能转化为更深入系统发育历史的准确物种关系。我们填补了这一知识空白,并特别确定了考虑溯祖变异的物种树方法在更深入系统发育中的挑战和局限性。使用具有实证研究特征的模拟数据,我们评估了估计物种树的准确性以及与顽固节点相关的特征,特别关注溯祖变异是否通常是缺乏分辨率的原因。通过确定支持特定节点的溯祖谱系的比例,我们证明:(1)物种树方法考虑了深层节点的溯祖变异;(2)突变变异——而非溯祖导致的基因树不一致——对整棵树的准确重建构成了主要挑战。例如,尽管预测基因谱系的随机合并会导致不一致,但许多节点仍被准确解析,支持度差的节点分布在一系列深度(即它们不限于特定的近期分化)。鉴于其广泛的分类范围和大量的分类群采样,深层次的系统发育带来了几个潜在的方法学复杂性,包括MCMC收敛困难以及基于溯祖方法所需种群遗传参数的估计。尽管存在这些困难,但研究结果总体上支持物种树分析在整个生命之树中估计物种关系的实用性。我们讨论了将物种树方法成功应用于深层次系统发育的策略。

相似文献

1
Applying species-tree analyses to deep phylogenetic histories: challenges and potential suggested from a survey of empirical phylogenetic studies.将物种树分析应用于深层系统发育历史:基于实证系统发育研究调查提出的挑战与潜力
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Feb;83:191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.022. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
2
A matter of phylogenetic scale: Distinguishing incomplete lineage sorting from lateral gene transfer as the cause of gene tree discord in recent versus deep diversification histories.一个关于系统发生尺度的问题:区分不完全谱系分选和水平基因转移作为导致近期和深远多样化历史中基因树分歧的原因。
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):376-384. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1064. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.尽管存在不完全谱系分选现象,仍可根据基因树概率估计物种系统发育:以黑蝗属蝗虫为例。
Syst Biol. 2007 Jun;56(3):400-11. doi: 10.1080/10635150701405560.
4
Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.种系树估计中固有的误差源:突变和合并效应对准确性的影响,以及对选择不同方法的影响。
Syst Biol. 2010 Oct;59(5):573-83. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq047. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
5
What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics?异常区对经验系统发生学有何危险?
Syst Biol. 2009 Oct;58(5):527-36. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp047. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
6
The gene tree delusion.基因树错觉
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Jan;94(Pt A):1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
7
Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.最大似然估计物种树:系统发育推断的准确性如何取决于分歧历史和采样设计。
Syst Biol. 2009 Oct;58(5):501-8. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp045. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent.在合并模型下缺失数据对物种树估计的影响。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):1057-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Effectiveness of phylogenomic data and coalescent species-tree methods for resolving difficult nodes in the phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes: Caenophidia).系统发育基因组数据和溯祖物种树方法在解决高等蛇类(有鳞目:新蛇亚目)系统发育中疑难节点的有效性
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Dec;81:221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
10
Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes.比较大型锚定系统发育基因组学和小型桑格测序分子数据集的物种树估计:马达加斯加伪蝰蛇的实证研究
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Oct 12;15:221. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0503-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Starship giant transposable elements cluster by host taxonomy using k-mer-based phylogenetics.使用基于k-mer的系统发育学,星际巨型转座因子按宿主分类法聚类。
G3 (Bethesda). 2025 Jun 4;15(6). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaf082.
2
CASTER: Direct species tree inference from whole-genome alignments.卡斯特:从全基因组比对中直接推断物种树。
Science. 2025 Feb 28;387(6737):eadk9688. doi: 10.1126/science.adk9688.
3
A region of suppressed recombination misleads neoavian phylogenomics.一个重组抑制区域误导了新鸟类系统发生基因组学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 9;121(15):e2319506121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319506121. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
4
Go west: Population genomics reveals unexpected population fluctuations and little gene flow in Western hemisphere populations of the predatory lady beetle, .向西:种群基因组学揭示了西半球捕食性瓢虫种群出人意料的波动以及极少的基因流动。
Evol Appl. 2023 Dec 29;17(1):e13631. doi: 10.1111/eva.13631. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Major Revisions in Pancrustacean Phylogeny and Evidence of Sensitivity to Taxon Sampling.泛甲壳动物系统发育的重大修订和对分类群采样敏感性的证据。
Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Aug 3;40(8). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad175.
6
Weighting by Gene Tree Uncertainty Improves Accuracy of Quartet-based Species Trees.基于基因树不确定性的加权可提高基于四元组的种系发生树的准确性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Dec 5;39(12). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac215.
7
QuCo: quartet-based co-estimation of species trees and gene trees.QuCo:基于四重奏的物种树和基因树的联合估计。
Bioinformatics. 2022 Jun 24;38(Suppl 1):i413-i421. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac265.
8
Evolutionary relationships and population genetics of the Afrotropical leaf-nosed bats (Chiroptera, Hipposideridae).非洲热带叶鼻蝠(翼手目,菊头蝠科)的进化关系与种群遗传学
Zookeys. 2020 Apr 22;929:117-161. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.929.50240. eCollection 2020.
9
Embracing heterogeneity: coalescing the Tree of Life and the future of phylogenomics.拥抱异质性:融合生命之树与系统发育基因组学的未来。
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 14;7:e6399. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6399. eCollection 2019.
10
Investigating Difficult Nodes in the Placental Mammal Tree with Expanded Taxon Sampling and Thousands of Ultraconserved Elements.通过扩展分类群采样和数千个超保守元件研究胎盘哺乳动物谱系中的疑难节点。
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):2308-2321. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx168.