da Silva M P, Merino R M, Mecawi A S, Moraes D J, Varanda W A
Department of Physiology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaysia, Malaysia.
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Jan 15;400:102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
The phenotypic differentiation between oxytocin (OT)- and vasopressin (VP)-secreting magnocellular neurosecretory cells (MNCs) from the supraoptic nucleus is relevant to understanding how several physiological and pharmacological challenges affect their electrical activity. Although the firing patterns of OT and VP neurons, both in vivo and in vitro, may appear different from each other, much is assumed about their characteristics. These assumptions make it practically impossible to obtain a confident phenotypic differentiation based exclusively on the firing patterns. The presence of a sustained outward rectifying potassium current (SOR) and/or an inward rectifying hyperpolarization-activated current (IR), which are presumably present in OT neurons and absent in VP neurons, has been used to distinguish between the two types of MNCs in the past. In this study, we aimed to analyze the accuracy of the phenotypic discrimination of MNCs based on the presence of rectifying currents using comparisons with the molecular phenotype of the cells, as determined by single-cell RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. Our results demonstrated that the phenotypes classified according to the electrophysiological protocol in brain slices do not match their molecular counterparts because vasopressinergic and intermediate neurons also exhibit both outward and inward rectifying currents. In addition, we also show that MNCs can change the relative proportion of each cell phenotype when the system is challenged by chronic hypertonicity (70% water restriction for 7 days). We conclude that for in vitro preparations, the combination of mRNA detection and immunohistochemistry seems to be preferable when trying to characterize a single MNC phenotype.
视上核中分泌催产素(OT)和血管加压素(VP)的大细胞神经分泌细胞(MNCs)之间的表型分化,对于理解多种生理和药理学刺激如何影响其电活动至关重要。尽管OT和VP神经元在体内和体外的放电模式可能彼此不同,但关于它们的特征仍有很多假设。这些假设使得仅基于放电模式获得可靠的表型分化几乎不可能。过去,持续外向整流钾电流(SOR)和/或内向整流超极化激活电流(IR)的存在(推测OT神经元中存在而VP神经元中不存在)被用于区分这两种类型的MNCs。在本研究中,我们旨在通过与单细胞RT-qPCR和免疫组织化学确定的细胞分子表型进行比较,分析基于整流电流的存在对MNCs进行表型鉴别的准确性。我们的结果表明,根据脑片电生理方案分类的表型与其分子对应物不匹配,因为血管加压素能神经元和中间神经元也表现出外向和内向整流电流。此外,我们还表明,当系统受到慢性高渗(7天70%水分限制)挑战时,MNCs可以改变每种细胞表型的相对比例。我们得出结论,对于体外制备,在试图表征单个MNC表型时,mRNA检测和免疫组织化学的结合似乎更可取。