Walsh Anna Lucy, Considine Shane W, Thomas Arun Z, Lynch Thomas H, Manecksha Rustom P
Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Urology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e783-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682861.
Currently, there is no standardised screening for prostate cancer in Europe. Assessment of risk is opportunistically undertaken in consultation with the GP or urologist. Evaluation of the prostate gland consists of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level and a digital rectal examination (DRE) of the gland. DRE is an essential part of the assessment that can independently predict prostate cancer in the setting of a normal PSA level.
To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the DRE in general practice and urology clinics, and to ascertain its positive predictive value and sensitivity.
A retrospective analysis study of a cohort of Irish men who underwent TRUS guided biopsy of the prostate in a single Irish tertiary referral centre, despite a normal PSA level. Patients were identified from a Rapid Access Prostate Clinic patient database. Pathological biopsy results were correlated with clinical DRE findings.
Patient demographics, PSA levels, and DRE findings from a prospectively established database and hospital data systems from May 2009 to October 2013 were analysed.
Of 103 men referred over a 53-month period with a normal age-adjusted PSA level, 67% were referred on the basis of an abnormal DRE alone. Thirty-five per cent of males with a normal PSA had prostate cancer. DRE alone had a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 40% respectively in diagnosing prostate cancer, with a positive predictive value of 42%. Seventy-six per cent of these men had high-grade disease.
DRE is a key part of the assessment for prostate cancer. It can independently identify patients at risk of prostate cancer, with a substantial proportion of these having clinically significant disease requiring treatment. This study reinforces the importance of DRE in the primary care setting in the assessment for prostate cancer. An abnormal DRE, even in the setting of a normal PSA level, necessitates referral.
目前,欧洲尚无针对前列腺癌的标准化筛查。风险评估是在与全科医生或泌尿科医生协商后进行的。前列腺评估包括前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)血清水平检测和前列腺指诊(DRE)。DRE是评估的重要组成部分,在PSA水平正常的情况下,它能够独立预测前列腺癌。
评估DRE在全科医疗和泌尿科诊所中的临床实用性,并确定其阳性预测值和敏感性。
对一组爱尔兰男性进行回顾性分析研究,这些男性尽管PSA水平正常,但在爱尔兰的一家三级转诊中心接受了经直肠超声引导下的前列腺活检。患者从快速通道前列腺诊所患者数据库中识别。病理活检结果与临床DRE结果相关。
分析2009年5月至2013年10月前瞻性建立的数据库以及医院数据系统中的患者人口统计学信息、PSA水平和DRE结果。
在53个月期间转诊的103名年龄调整后PSA水平正常的男性中,67%仅基于DRE异常转诊。PSA正常的男性中有35%患有前列腺癌。仅DRE诊断前列腺癌的敏感性和特异性分别为81%和40%,阳性预测值为42%。这些男性中有76%患有高级别疾病。
DRE是前列腺癌评估的关键部分。它能够独立识别有前列腺癌风险的患者,其中很大一部分患有需要治疗的具有临床意义的疾病。本研究强化了DRE在初级保健环境中对前列腺癌评估的重要性。即使PSA水平正常,但DRE异常也需要转诊。