Suppr超能文献

67例因臀中肌和臀小肌腱撕裂接受手术的患者的临床和MRI结果,中位随访时间为4.6年。

Clinical and MRI results in 67 patients operated for gluteus medius and minimus tendon tears with a median follow-up of 4.6 years.

作者信息

Makridis K G, Lequesne M, Bard H, Djian P

机构信息

Clinique Nollet, 23, rue Brochant, 75017 Paris, France.

33, rue Guilleminot, 75014 Paris, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):849-53. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although various techniques can be used to repair gluteal tendon tears, the long-term outcome is unclear and published studies typically involve only a small number of patients. The goals of this study were to determine (1) if functional improvement can be obtained, (2) if the repairs are continuous based on MRI, and (3) which factors determine success.

HYPOTHESIS

Gluteus medius and minimus tears can be repaired effectively with an open double-row technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients were operated on between 2003 and 2010. Of these patients, 67 (62 women, 5 men) were available for review consisting of functional clinical tests and MRI of the hip and pelvis. A double-row repair was performed on all tendon tears, no matter the type of injury. Age, body mass index (BMI), fatty degeneration and muscle atrophy were also evaluated to determine if these variables affected the outcome.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 4.6 years (range 1-8). The pre-operative scores had improved at the last follow-up: (1) pain (VAS): 8.7 ± 1.1 versus 1.7 ± 2.7 at the follow-up, (P<0.001), (2) Lequesne index: 12.3 ± 2.6 versus 4.0 ± 4.0 at the follow-up, (P<0.001), (3) Harris Hip Score: 50.5 ± 8 versus 87.9 ± 15.5 at the follow-up, (P<0.001). There were 11 failures (16%) including two repeat tears that were reoperated successfully. In the other 56 patients, the MRI showed no signs of the initial tear or bursitis. Of the four factors (age, BMI, fatty degeneration, muscle atrophy) that were potential predictors of the outcome, only muscle atrophy had a negative impact on functional outcome (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Using an open double-row technique to repair gluteal tendon tears led to 85% of patients having good clinical results with significant improvement in symptoms and disappearance of abnormal findings on MRI. This technique can be used with all types of tendon tears, but should be performed before muscle atrophy sets in.

LEVEL OF PROOF

Level IV-retrospective study.

摘要

引言

尽管可采用多种技术修复臀肌腱撕裂,但长期疗效尚不清楚,且已发表的研究通常仅涉及少数患者。本研究的目的是确定:(1)是否能获得功能改善;(2)基于MRI检查修复是否连续;(3)哪些因素决定手术成功。

假设

采用开放双排技术可有效修复臀中肌和臀小肌撕裂。

材料与方法

2003年至2010年间对73例患者进行了手术。其中67例(62名女性,5名男性)可进行复查,包括髋关节和骨盆的功能临床检查及MRI检查。无论损伤类型如何,所有肌腱撕裂均采用双排修复。还评估了年龄、体重指数(BMI)、脂肪变性和肌肉萎缩情况,以确定这些变量是否会影响手术结果。

结果

平均随访时间为4.6年(范围1 - 8年)。末次随访时术前评分有所改善:(1)疼痛(视觉模拟评分法,VAS):术前8.7±1.1,随访时为1.7±2.7,(P<0.001);(2)勒凯斯内指数:术前12.3±2.6,随访时为4.0±4.0,(P<0.001);(3)Harris髋关节评分:术前50.5±8,随访时为87.9±15.5,(P<0.001)。有11例失败(16%),包括2例再次撕裂,再次手术成功。在其他56例患者中,MRI未显示初始撕裂或滑囊炎的迹象。在作为手术结果潜在预测因素的四个因素(年龄、BMI、脂肪变性、肌肉萎缩)中,只有肌肉萎缩对功能结果有负面影响(P<0.05)。

结论

采用开放双排技术修复臀肌腱撕裂,85%的患者临床效果良好,症状显著改善,MRI异常表现消失。该技术可用于所有类型的肌腱撕裂,但应在肌肉萎缩出现之前进行。

证据水平

IV级——回顾性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验