Bouchard A, Garret J, Favard L, Charles H, Ollat D
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin Saint-Mandé, 69, avenue de Paris, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France.
Clinique du Parc, 69000 Lyon, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8 Suppl):S365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression (acromioplasty) is widely held to be effective, although pain may persist after the procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients with residual pain (i.e., the failure rate) after isolated subacromial decompression and to look for predictors of failure.
We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of 108 patients managed with isolated arthroscopic subacromial decompression between 2007 and 2011, for any reason. We excluded patients in whom surgical procedures on the rotator cuff tendons were performed concomitantly. Data were collected from the medical records, a telephone questionnaire, and radiographs obtained before surgery and at last follow-up. Failure was defined as persistent pain (visual analogue scale score>3) more than 6 months after surgery and at last follow-up.
The failure rate was 29% (31/108). Two factors significantly predicted failure, namely, receiving workers' compensation benefits for the shoulder condition and co-planing. Heterogeneous calcific tendinopathy and deep partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were also associated with poorer outcomes, but the effect was not statistically significant.
Co-planing may predict failure of subacromial decompression, although whether this effect is due to an insufficient degree of co-planing or to the technique itself is unclear. Nevertheless, in patients with symptoms from the acromio-clavicular joint, acromio-clavicular resection is probably the best option. Receiving workers' compensation benefits was also associated with treatment failure, as a result of well-known parameters related to the social welfare system.
Isolated arthroscopic subacromial decompression is effective in 70% of cases. We recommend the utmost caution if co-planing is considered and/or the patient receives workers' compensation benefits for the shoulder condition, as these two factors are associated with a significant increase in the failure rate.
IV (retrospective study).
关节镜下肩峰下减压术(肩峰成形术)被广泛认为是有效的,尽管术后疼痛可能会持续存在。本研究的目的是评估单纯肩峰下减压术后残留疼痛患者的比例(即失败率),并寻找失败的预测因素。
我们对2007年至2011年间因任何原因接受单纯关节镜下肩峰下减压术治疗的108例患者进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。我们排除了同时进行肩袖肌腱手术的患者。数据从病历、电话问卷以及术前和最后一次随访时获得的X线片中收集。失败定义为术后6个月以上及最后一次随访时持续疼痛(视觉模拟评分>3)。
失败率为29%(31/108)。两个因素显著预测失败,即因肩部疾病领取工伤赔偿和共平面。异质性钙化性肌腱病和深部部分厚度肩袖撕裂也与较差的结果相关,但效果无统计学意义。
共平面可能预测肩峰下减压术的失败,尽管这种影响是由于共平面程度不足还是技术本身尚不清楚。然而,对于有肩锁关节症状的患者,肩锁关节切除术可能是最佳选择。由于与社会福利系统相关的众所周知的参数,领取工伤赔偿也与治疗失败有关。
单纯关节镜下肩峰下减压术在70%的病例中是有效的。如果考虑共平面和/或患者因肩部疾病领取工伤赔偿,我们建议极度谨慎,因为这两个因素与失败率的显著增加相关。
IV(回顾性研究)。