Shields Edward, Thirukumaran Caroline, Noyes Katia, Voloshin Ilya
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017 Dec;8(4):208-214. doi: 10.1177/2151458517732209. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Workers' compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze a database of geriatric workers' compensation patients after surgical repair of the rotator cuff and identify both medical and nonmedical patient factors that influence the time it takes for them to return to work at full duty, including a comparison of arthroscopic and open techniques.
An all workers' compensation database was queried for rotator cuff claims that were surgically managed using arthroscopic, open, or both approaches from 2003 to 2013 in patients aged ≥60. Primary outcomes were the number of days for return to full work (RTW) following surgery and the total reimbursement for health care. Multivariate analysis was performed, and data are presented as average ± standard deviation.
The database yielded 1903 claims for surgically treated rotator cuff conditions (arthroscopic n = 935; open n = 926; both n = 42). In multivariate RTW analyses, we did not find a significant difference between groups (RTW in days was 153 ± 134 for arthroscopy [ = .81], 160 ± 160 for open [Ref], and 140 ± 82 days for both [ = .75]). However, multivariate analysis of reimbursement claims found arthroscopic surgery claims to be 13% higher compared to claims for open surgery only (US $29 986 ± 16 259 for arthroscopy vs US $26 495 ± 13 186 for open, < .001). Patients aged ≥65 had more medical expenses than patients aged 60 to 64 ( = .03). Potentially modifiable variables that significantly prolonged RTW timing and higher health-care claims included need for vocational rehabilitation services and filing of a legal suit.
Return to full-duty work in geriatric workers' compensation patients after rotator cuff repair takes about 5 months regardless of surgical approach and costs significantly more in patients aged ≥65. Arthroscopic repairs generated 13% more cumulative health-care costs than open surgery alone. More efficient vocational rehabilitation services and minimizing legal suits may help get patients back to work sooner and reduce overall costs.
工伤赔偿状况与肩袖修复手术后的不良预后相关。本研究的目的是分析一组老年工伤赔偿患者肩袖手术修复后的数据库,确定影响他们全负荷恢复工作所需时间的医学和非医学因素,包括关节镜手术与开放手术技术的比较。
查询2003年至2013年期间年龄≥60岁、采用关节镜、开放或两种方法进行手术治疗的肩袖损伤工伤赔偿所有数据库。主要结局指标为术后恢复全负荷工作(RTW)的天数及医疗保健总费用。进行多因素分析,数据以平均值±标准差表示。
该数据库产生了1903例接受手术治疗的肩袖损伤索赔(关节镜手术n = 935;开放手术n = 926;两种手术方式均采用n = 42)。在多因素RTW分析中,我们未发现各手术组之间存在显著差异(关节镜手术组RTW天数为153±134天[P = 0.81],开放手术组为160±160天[参考值],两种手术方式均采用组为140±82天[P = 0.75])。然而,医疗费用报销的多因素分析发现,关节镜手术索赔比仅开放手术索赔高出13%(关节镜手术为29986美元±l6259美元,开放手术为26495美元±13186美元,P < 0.001)。年龄≥65岁的患者比60至64岁的患者医疗费用更高(P = 0.03)。显著延长RTW时间和增加医疗保健索赔的潜在可改变因素包括需要职业康复服务和提起法律诉讼。
老年工伤赔偿患者肩袖修复术后恢复全负荷工作无论采用何种手术方式大约需要5个月,且≥65岁患者的费用显著更高。关节镜修复术所产生的累计医疗费用比单纯开放手术多13%。更有效的职业康复服务和尽量减少法律诉讼可能有助于患者更快恢复工作并降低总体费用。