Morrison Michael
Centre for Health, Law & Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Room 120, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, OX3 7LF Oxford, Oxon, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
This paper takes the biological drug human Growth Hormone (hGH) as a case study to investigate processes of pharmaceuticalisation and medicalisation in configuring childhood short stature as a site for pharmaceutical intervention. Human growth hormone is considered to have legitimate applications in treating childhood growth hormone deficiency and short stature associated with other recognised conditions. It is also regarded by bioethicists and others as a form of human biomedical enhancement when applied to children with idiopathic or 'normal' short stature. The purpose of this study is not to evaluate whether treatment of idiopathic short stature is enhancement or not, but to evaluate how some applications of hGH in treating short stature have come to be accepted and stabilised as legitimate 'therapies' while others remain contested as 'enhancements'. A comparative, historical approach is employed, drawing on approaches from medical sociology and Science and Technology Studies (STS) to set out a socio-technical history of hGH in the US and UK. Through this history the relative influence and interplay of drivers of pharmaceuticalisation, including industry marketing and networks of drug distribution, and processes of medicalisation will be employed to address this question and simultaneously query the value of enhancement as a sociological concept.
本文以生物药物人生长激素(hGH)为例,研究将儿童身材矮小构建为药物干预位点的制药化和医学化过程。人生长激素被认为在治疗儿童生长激素缺乏症以及与其他公认病症相关的身材矮小方面有合理应用。当应用于特发性或“正常”身材矮小的儿童时,生物伦理学家和其他人也将其视为一种人类生物医学增强形式。本研究的目的不是评估对特发性身材矮小的治疗是否属于增强,而是评估hGH在治疗身材矮小方面的一些应用如何逐渐被接受并稳固为合法的“疗法”,而其他一些应用则仍被视为有争议的“增强手段”。采用了一种比较历史方法,借鉴医学社会学和科学技术研究(STS)的方法,阐述美国和英国hGH的社会技术史。通过这段历史,制药化驱动因素(包括行业营销和药物分销网络)以及医学化过程的相对影响和相互作用将被用来解决这个问题,同时质疑增强作为一个社会学概念的价值。