Inaccuracy of patient care reports for identification of critical resuscitation events during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the patient care report (PCR) for detection of 2 clinically important events: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and rearrest (RA).

METHODS

We used defibrillator recordings and PCRs for Emergency Medical Services-treated OHCA collected by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium's Pittsburgh site from 2006 to 2008 and 2011 to 2012. Defibrillator data included electrocardiogram rhythm tracing, chest compression measurement, and audio voice recording. Sensitivity analysis was performed by comparing the accuracy of the PCR to detect the presence and number of ROSC and RA events to integrated defibrillator data.

RESULTS

In the 158 OHCA cases, there were 163 ROSC events and 53 RA events. The sensitivity of PCRs to identify all ROSC events was 85% (confidence interval [CI], .795-.905); to identify primary ROSC events, it was 85% (CI, .793-.907); and to identify secondary ROSC events, it was 78% (CI, .565-.995). The sensitivity of PCRs to identify the presence of all RA events was .60 (CI, .469-.731); to identify primary RA events, it was 71% (CI, .578-.842); and to identify secondary RA events, it was 0. Of the 32 RA incidents captured by the PCR, only 15 (47%) correctly identified the correct lethal arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that PCRs are not a reliable source of information for assessing the presence of ROSC and post-RA electrocardiogram rhythm. For quality control and research purposes, medical providers should consider augmenting data collection with continuous defibrillator recordings before making any conclusions about the occurrence of critical resuscitation events.