Babey Susan H, Wu Shinyi, Cohen Deborah
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
School of Social Work, Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
For optimal health, physical activity should be an integral and routine part of daily life. Youth spend a significant amount of time at school yet rarely achieve the recommended 60 min of moderate and vigorous physical activity in physical education (PE) classes or recess. This study assessed the following types of school-based opportunities to improve physical activity for youth: after-school programs, before-school programs, PE classes, extended-day PE, and short physical activity breaks during the school day.
An economic analysis conducted in 2013 compared school-based approaches to increasing physical activity. Analysis factors included costs, reach, effects on physical activity gains, cost-effectiveness, and other potentially augmenting benefits.
Two programs were significantly superior in terms of reach and cost per student: (1) extending the school day with mandatory PE participation and (2) offering short (10-minute) physical activity breaks during regular classroom hours. After-school program costs per student are high and the programs have a smaller reach, but they offer benefits (such as childcare) that may justify their higher costs. Before-school programs did not appear feasible.
Incorporating short physical activity breaks into the existing school day would be a cost-effective way to increase school-based activity. This type of program is inexpensive and has broad reach. Inserting activity breaks throughout the day is appropriate, especially when youth are otherwise largely sedentary.
为了实现最佳健康状态,体育活动应成为日常生活中不可或缺的常规部分。青少年在学校度过大量时间,但在体育课或课间休息时很少能达到建议的60分钟中等强度和剧烈体育活动量。本研究评估了以下几种以学校为基础的促进青少年体育活动的机会类型:课后项目、课前项目、体育课、延长课时的体育课以及在校期间的短暂体育活动休息时间。
2013年进行的一项经济分析比较了以学校为基础增加体育活动的方法。分析因素包括成本、覆盖面、对体育活动增加的影响、成本效益以及其他潜在的附加益处。
有两个项目在覆盖面和人均成本方面显著更优:(1)通过强制学生参加体育课来延长在校时间;(2)在常规课堂时间提供短暂(10分钟)的体育活动休息时间。课后项目的人均成本较高,覆盖面较小,但它们提供了一些益处(如儿童保育),这可能使其较高的成本具有合理性。课前项目似乎不可行。
将短暂的体育活动休息时间纳入现有的在校日是增加校内体育活动的一种具有成本效益的方式。这类项目成本低廉且覆盖面广。在一天中穿插安排活动休息时间是合适的,尤其是当青少年在其他时间大多久坐不动的时候。