Ashburner Jeffrey M, Go Alan S, Reynolds Kristi, Chang Yuchiao, Fang Margaret C, Fredman Lisa, Applebaum Katie M, Singer Daniel E
Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Epidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 1;115(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
To date, there have been few studies evaluating outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have experienced gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhages. We examined short- and long-term mortality of major GI hemorrhage in patients with AF on and off warfarin in recent clinical care. We evaluated this association in the large Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) and ATRIA-Cardiovascular Research Network (CVRN) California community-based cohorts of patients with AF (study years 1996 to 2003 and 2006 to 2009, respectively), where all events were clinician adjudicated. We used proportional hazards regression with propensity score adjustment to estimate the short- (30 days) and long-term (>30 days for 1 year) mortality rate ratio for patients using warfarin compared with those who were not using warfarin at the time of GI hemorrhage. In the 414 ATRIA participants with major GI hemorrhage, 54% were taking warfarin at the time of the hemorrhage; in the 361 ATRIA-CVRN participants with major GI hemorrhage, 58% were taking warfarin. Warfarin use at the time of GI hemorrhage was not associated with 30-day mortality in the ATRIA cohort but was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality in the ATRIA-CVRN cohort (adjusted mortality rate ratio [95% confidence interval], ATRIA 0.97 [0.54 to 1.74]; ATRIA-CVRN 0.38 [0.17 to 0.83]). There was a modest suggestion of lower mortality on warfarin after 30 days in both cohorts. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that GI hemorrhages on warfarin are certainly no worse and may be less life threatening than those occurring off warfarin. These findings are in stark contrast to the deleterious effect of warfarin on mortality from intracranial hemorrhage and add another factor favoring anticoagulation in clinical decision making for patients with AF.
迄今为止,很少有研究评估经历过胃肠道(GI)出血的房颤(AF)患者的预后。我们在近期临床护理中,研究了服用和未服用华法林的房颤患者发生重大GI出血后的短期和长期死亡率。我们在大型的房颤抗凝与危险因素(ATRIA)以及基于加利福尼亚社区队列的ATRIA - 心血管研究网络(CVRN)的房颤患者中评估了这种关联(研究年份分别为1996年至2003年和2006年至2009年),所有事件均由临床医生判定。我们使用倾向评分调整的比例风险回归来估计与GI出血时未使用华法林的患者相比,使用华法林的患者的短期(30天)和长期(超过30天至1年)死亡率比值。在414例发生重大GI出血的ATRIA参与者中,54%在出血时正在服用华法林;在361例发生重大GI出血的ATRIA - CVRN参与者中,58%在服用华法林。在ATRIA队列中,GI出血时使用华法林与30天死亡率无关,但在ATRIA - CVRN队列中与显著降低的30天死亡率相关(调整后的死亡率比值[95%置信区间],ATRIA为0.97[0.54至1.74];ATRIA - CVRN为0.38[0.17至0.83])。两个队列在30天后使用华法林的患者死亡率均有适度降低的趋势。总之,我们的研究表明,服用华法林时发生的GI出血肯定并不更糟,而且可能比未服用华法林时发生的出血对生命的威胁更小。这些发现与华法林对颅内出血死亡率的有害影响形成鲜明对比,并为房颤患者临床决策中支持抗凝治疗增添了另一个因素。