Suppr超能文献

经皮喉超声检查中的超声标志在甲状腺切除术后声带评估中的重要性。

The importance of sonographic landmarks by transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography in post-thyroidectomy vocal cord assessment.

作者信息

Wong Kai-Pun, Woo Jung-Woo, Youn Yeo-Kyu, Chow Felix Che-Lok, Lee Kyu Eun, Lang Brian Hung-Hin

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surgery. 2014 Dec;156(6):1590-6; discussion 1596. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.08.061. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During examination of the vocal cords (VC) using transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG), 3 sonographic landmarks (namely, false VC [FC], true VC [TC], and arytenoids [AR]) are often seen. However, it remains unclear which landmark provides a more reliable assessment and whether seeing more landmarks improves the diagnostic accuracy and reliability.

METHODS

We evaluated prospectively 245 patients from 2 centers. One assessor from each center performed all TLUSG examinations and their findings were validated by direct laryngoscopy. All 3 sonographic landmarks were routinely visualized whenever possible. The rate of visualization and diagnostic accuracy between the 3 landmarks were compared.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients suffered postoperative VC palsy (VCP). Both centers had comparable visualization or assessability rate of ≥ 1 sonographic landmark (94.9 and 95.3%; P = 1.000) and 100% sensitivity on postoperative TLUSG. The rates of FC, TC, and AR visualization were 92.7%, 36.7%, and 89.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy and the proportion of true positives, false positives, and true negatives between using 1, 2, landmarks and 3 landmarks were comparable (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Each sonographic landmark had similar reliability and diagnostic accuracy. Identifying all 3 sonographic landmarks was not mandatory and visualizing normal movement in one of the sonographic landmarks would be sufficient to exclude VCP.

摘要

引言

在使用经皮喉超声检查(TLUSG)检查声带(VC)时,经常可以看到3个超声标志(即假声带[FC]、真声带[TC]和杓状软骨[AR])。然而,尚不清楚哪个标志能提供更可靠的评估,以及看到更多标志是否能提高诊断准确性和可靠性。

方法

我们前瞻性地评估了来自2个中心的245例患者。每个中心的一名评估者进行了所有的TLUSG检查,其结果通过直接喉镜检查进行验证。只要有可能,所有3个超声标志都会常规显示。比较了这3个标志之间的显示率和诊断准确性。

结果

18例患者术后出现声带麻痹(VCP)。两个中心的≥1个超声标志的显示率或可评估率相当(分别为94.9%和95.3%;P = 1.000),术后TLUSG的敏感性为100%。FC、TC和AR的显示率分别为92.7%、36.7%和89.8%。使用1个、2个标志和3个标志时的敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性以及真阳性、假阳性和真阴性比例相当(P > 0.05)。

结论

每个超声标志具有相似的可靠性和诊断准确性。识别所有3个超声标志并非必需,在其中一个超声标志中观察到正常运动就足以排除VCP。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验