Medical Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
The availability of new agents (NAs) active in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel treatment (abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, and enzalutamide) has led to the possibility of using them sequentially to obtain a cumulative survival benefit.
To provide clinical outcome data relating to a large cohort of mCRPC patients who received a third-line NA after the failure of docetaxel and another NA.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who had received at least two successive NAs after the failure of docetaxel.
The independent prognostic value of a series of pretreatment covariates on the primary outcome measure of overall survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis.
We assessed 260 patients who received one third-line NA between January 2012 and December 2013, including 38 who received a further NA as fourth-line therapy. The median progression-free and overall survival from the start of third-line therapy was, respectively, 4 mo and 11 mo, with no significant differences between the NAs. Performance status, and haemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase levels were the only independent prognostic factors. The limitations of the study are mainly due its retrospective nature and the small number of patients treated with some of the sequences.
We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the clinical outcomes of third-line NAs regardless of previous NA therapy.
It is debated which sequence of treatments to adopt after docetaxel. Our data do not support the superiority of any of the three new agents in third-line treatment, regardless of the previously administered new agent.
在多西他赛治疗后进展的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中,新的药物(NAs)的出现(醋酸阿比特龙、卡巴他赛和恩扎鲁胺)使得连续使用这些药物以获得累积生存获益成为可能。
提供与接受多西他赛失败后第三线 NAs 治疗的大量 mCRPC 患者的临床结果数据。
设计、地点和参与者:我们回顾性地审查了至少接受过两次连续 NAs 治疗的患者的临床记录。
使用 Cox 回归分析评估一系列预处理协变量对主要总生存结局测量的独立预后价值。
我们评估了 2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间接受一线 NAs 的 260 例患者,其中 38 例患者接受了第四线治疗的进一步 NAs。从三线治疗开始的中位无进展生存和总生存时间分别为 4 个月和 11 个月,不同 NAs 之间无显著差异。表现状态、血红蛋白和碱性磷酸酶水平是唯一的独立预后因素。研究的局限性主要是由于其回顾性性质和一些序列中治疗的患者数量较少。
无论先前的 NA 治疗如何,我们都未能证明三线 NAs 的临床结局存在差异。
在多西他赛之后采用哪种治疗方案存在争议。我们的数据不支持在三线治疗中使用三种新药物中的任何一种具有优势,无论之前使用的新药物是什么。