Miyake Hideaki, Hara Takuto, Tamura Keita, Sugiyama Takayuki, Furuse Hiroshi, Ozono Seiichiro, Fujisawa Masato
Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan; Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jun;35(6):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic effect of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (TTPN) after treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz) in patients with docetaxel-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
This study included a total of 297 consecutive patients with mCRPC, of whom 125 and 172 received AA and Enz, respectively, without previous treatment with docetaxel and subsequently achieved any degree of PSA reduction after the administration of either agent.
The mean values of TTPN in the AA and Enz groups were 19 and 14 weeks, respectively. Despite the lack of significant differences in several parameters according to the mean TTPN in the Enz group, patients with TTPN>19 weeks were characterized by longer duration of androgen deprivation therapy, better performance status, lower incidence of bone metastasis, lower value of nadir PSA, and higher incidence of PSA response than those with TTPN ≤19 weeks in the AA group. The PSA progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with TTPN >19 weeks was significantly superior when compared with TTPN ≤19 weeks in the AA group; however, there was no significant effect of the mean TTPN on the PSA-PFS in the Enz group. Furthermore, TTPN was identified as one of the independent predictors of PSA-PFS in the AA group but not in Enz group.
A longer time to reach a PSA nadir after treatment with AA, but not Enz, appeared to be associated with favorable disease control in patients with docetaxel-naïve mCRPC.
本研究旨在比较醋酸阿比特龙(AA)和恩杂鲁胺(Enz)治疗初治转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者后,至前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)最低点时间(TTPN)的预后效果。
本研究共纳入297例连续的mCRPC患者,其中125例和172例分别接受了AA和Enz治疗,此前未接受多西他赛治疗,且在使用任一药物后均实现了不同程度的PSA降低。
AA组和Enz组的TTPN平均值分别为19周和14周。尽管根据Enz组的平均TTPN,几个参数没有显著差异,但与AA组中TTPN≤19周的患者相比,TTPN>19周的患者具有更长的雄激素剥夺治疗持续时间、更好的身体状况、更低的骨转移发生率、更低的PSA最低点值以及更高的PSA反应发生率。与AA组中TTPN≤19周的患者相比,TTPN>19周的患者的PSA无进展生存期(PFS)显著更长;然而,平均TTPN对Enz组的PSA-PFS没有显著影响。此外,TTPN被确定为AA组中PSA-PFS的独立预测因素之一,但在Enz组中不是。
对于初治mCRPC患者,使用AA治疗后达到PSA最低点的时间较长似乎与良好的疾病控制相关,而使用Enz治疗则不然。