Rivas R J, Moore H P
Department of Physiology-Anatomy, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):51-60. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.51.
Recent experiments using DNA transfection have shown that secretory proteins in AtT-20 cells are sorted into two biochemically distinct secretory pathways. These two pathways differ in the temporal regulation of exocytosis. Proteins secreted by the regulated pathway are stored in dense-core granules until release is stimulated by secretagogues. In contrast, proteins secreted by the constitutive pathway are exported continuously, without storage. It is not known whether there are mechanisms to segregate regulated and constitutive secretory vesicles spatially. In this study, we examined the site of insertion of constitutive vesicles and compared it with that of regulated secretory granules. Regulated granules accumulate at tips of processes in these cells. To determine whether constitutively externalized membrane proteins are inserted into plasma membrane at the cell body or at process tips, AtT-20 cells were infected with ts-O45, a temperature-sensitive mutant of vesicular stomatitis virus in which transport of the surface glycoprotein G is conditionally blocked in the ER. After switching to the permissive temperature, insertion of G protein was detected at the cell body, not at process tips. Targeting of constitutive and regulated secretory vesicles to distinct areas of the plasma membrane appears to be mediated by microtubules. We found that while disruption of microtubules by colchicine had no effect on constitutive secretion, it completely blocked the accumulation of regulated granules at special release sites. Colchicine also affected the proper packaging of regulated secretory proteins. We conclude that regulated and constitutive secretory vesicles are targeted to different areas of the plasma membrane, most probably by differential interactions with microtubules. These results imply that regulated secretory granules may have unique membrane receptors for selective attachment to microtubules.
近期利用DNA转染技术进行的实验表明,AtT - 20细胞中的分泌蛋白被分选到两条生物化学性质不同的分泌途径中。这两条途径在胞吐作用的时间调控上存在差异。受调控途径分泌的蛋白质储存在致密核心颗粒中,直到促分泌剂刺激释放。相比之下,组成型途径分泌的蛋白质持续输出,无需储存。目前尚不清楚是否存在在空间上分离受调控和组成型分泌囊泡的机制。在本研究中,我们检查了组成型囊泡的插入位点,并将其与受调控分泌颗粒的插入位点进行了比较。受调控的颗粒在这些细胞的突起末端积累。为了确定组成型外化的膜蛋白是在细胞体还是在突起末端插入质膜,AtT - 20细胞用ts - O45感染,ts - O45是水疱性口炎病毒的温度敏感突变体,其中表面糖蛋白G的运输在内质网中受到条件性阻断。切换到允许温度后,在细胞体而非突起末端检测到G蛋白的插入。组成型和受调控的分泌囊泡靶向质膜不同区域的过程似乎是由微管介导的。我们发现,虽然秋水仙碱破坏微管对组成型分泌没有影响,但它完全阻断了受调控颗粒在特殊释放位点的积累。秋水仙碱还影响受调控分泌蛋白的正确包装。我们得出结论,受调控和组成型分泌囊泡靶向质膜的不同区域,很可能是通过与微管的不同相互作用。这些结果表明,受调控的分泌颗粒可能具有独特的膜受体,用于选择性附着于微管。