Koch Sabine, Fleischer Steffen
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108 Suppl 1:S9-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
The nursing Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) and other nursing quality indices summarise relevant health and nursing outcomes for long-term care that are recommended as quality measures. These are measures like "Percent of High-Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers", "Percent of Low-Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowels or Bladder", "Percent of Residents Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury", "Percent of Residents Who Lose Too Much Weight" etc. Analyses of healthcare data in Germany showed a substantial higher risk for negative outcomes in the long-term care setting in persons with dementia compared to persons without dementia. There already exist evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for most of the quality measures and underlying health problems (e.g., the German "Expertenstandards in der Pflege"). Implementation and translation of evidence have not been systematically researched yet, and there is uncertainty about structures and processes that support implementation and eventually lead to improved nursing outcomes in people with dementia in long-term care.
Studies showed a potential benefit of master-level geriatric advanced practice nurses (GAPNs) concerning the implementation of evidence-based guidelines. This corresponds to the expectation that academic nursing staff positively influences research utilisation in practice. A systematic review identified four controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of GAPN on select quality measures. Both the internal and external validity of the trials require a thorough investigation into the intervention before translation and effectiveness research in Germany can be recommended.
In accordance with national and international recommendations on the development and clinical evaluation of complex interventions, we recommend a multistage model. Such a model comprises the conceptualisation and adaptation of the original intervention. In this way, the original concept of a GAPN has to be translated into the context of the German healthcare system. Furthermore, feasibility of the intervention in general has to be investigated. This includes acceptance of GAPNs in practice and the necessary prerequisites, especially concerning a comprehensive commitment of one APN to more than one long-term care facility.
护理最低数据集3.0(MDS 3.0)及其他护理质量指标总结了长期护理中相关的健康和护理结果,这些被推荐作为质量衡量标准。这些指标包括“患有压疮的高危居民百分比”“大小便失禁的低危居民百分比”“发生一次或多次重大伤害跌倒的居民百分比”“体重减轻过多的居民百分比”等。德国医疗保健数据分析表明,与无痴呆症的人相比,痴呆症患者在长期护理环境中出现负面结果的风险显著更高。对于大多数质量衡量标准和潜在健康问题,已有基于证据的指南和建议(例如德国的《护理专家标准》)。然而,证据的实施和转化尚未得到系统研究,对于支持实施并最终改善长期护理中痴呆症患者护理结果的结构和流程也存在不确定性。
研究表明,硕士水平的老年高级实践护士(GAPN)在实施基于证据的指南方面具有潜在益处。这符合学术护理人员对实践中研究应用产生积极影响的预期。一项系统评价确定了四项对照试验,评估了GAPN对选定质量衡量标准的有效性。在德国推荐进行转化和有效性研究之前,试验的内部和外部有效性都需要对干预措施进行深入调查。
根据关于复杂干预措施开发和临床评估的国家和国际建议,我们推荐一种多阶段模型。这样的模型包括对原始干预措施的概念化和调整。通过这种方式,GAPN的原始概念必须转化到德国医疗保健系统的背景中。此外,一般还必须调查干预措施的可行性。这包括GAPN在实践中的接受度以及必要的先决条件,特别是关于一名高级实践护士同时为多个长期护理机构提供全面服务的情况。