Transfusion for shock in US military war casualties with and without tourniquet use.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We assess whether emergency tourniquet use for transfused war casualties admitted to military hospitals is associated with survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of trauma registry data was made of US casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq. Patients with major limb trauma, transfusion, and tourniquet use were compared with similar patients who did not receive tourniquet use. A propensity-matching analysis was performed by stratifying for injury type and severity by tourniquet-use status. Additionally, direct comparison without propensity matching was made between tourniquet use and no-tourniquet use groups.

RESULTS

There were 720 casualties in the tourniquet use and 693 in the no-tourniquet use groups. Of the 1,413 casualties, 66% (928) also had nonextremity injury. Casualties with tourniquet use had worse signs of hemorrhagic shock (admission base deficit, admission hemoglobin, admission pulse, and transfusion units required) than those without. Survival rates were similar between the 2 groups (1% difference; 95% confidence interval -2.5% to 4.2%), but casualties who received tourniquets had worse shock and received more blood products. In propensity-matched casualties, survival rates were not different (2% difference; 95% confidence interval -6.7% to 2.7%) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Tourniquet use was associated with worse shock and more transfusion requirements among hospital-admitted casualties, yet those who received tourniquets had survival rates similar to those of comparable, transfused casualties who did not receive tourniquets.