Shackelford Stacy A, Del Junco Deborah J, Powell-Dunford Nicole, Mazuchowski Edward L, Howard Jeffrey T, Kotwal Russ S, Gurney Jennifer, Butler Frank K, Gross Kirby, Stockinger Zsolt T
Joint Trauma System, Defense Center of Excellence for Trauma, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1581-1591. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15097.
Prehospital blood product transfusion in trauma care remains controversial due to poor-quality evidence and cost. Sequential expansion of blood transfusion capability after 2012 to deployed military medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) units enabled a concurrent cohort study to focus on the timing as well as the location of the initial transfusion.
To examine the association of prehospital transfusion and time to initial transfusion with injury survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of US military combat casualties in Afghanistan between April 1, 2012, and August 7, 2015. Eligible patients were rescued alive by MEDEVAC from point of injury with either (1) a traumatic limb amputation at or above the knee or elbow or (2) shock defined as a systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg or a heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute.
Initiation of prehospital transfusion and time from MEDEVAC rescue to first transfusion, regardless of location (ie, prior to or during hospitalization). Transfusion recipients were compared with nonrecipients (unexposed) for whom transfusion was delayed or not given.
Mortality at 24 hours and 30 days after MEDEVAC rescue were coprimary outcomes. To balance injury severity, nonrecipients of prehospital transfusion were frequency matched to recipients by mechanism of injury, prehospital shock, severity of limb amputation, head injury, and torso hemorrhage. Cox regression was stratified by matched groups and also adjusted for age, injury year, transport team, tourniquet use, and time to MEDEVAC rescue.
Of 502 patients (median age, 25 years [interquartile range, 22 to 29 years]; 98% male), 3 of 55 prehospital transfusion recipients (5%) and 85 of 447 nonrecipients (19%) died within 24 hours of MEDEVAC rescue (between-group difference, -14% [95% CI, -21% to -6%]; P = .01). By day 30, 6 recipients (11%) and 102 nonrecipients (23%) died (between-group difference, -12% [95% CI, -21% to -2%]; P = .04). For the 386 patients without missing covariate data among the 400 patients within the matched groups, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality associated with prehospital transfusion was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.84, P = .02) over 24 hours (3 deaths among 54 recipients vs 67 deaths among 332 matched nonrecipients) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.92, P = .03) over 30 days (6 vs 76 deaths, respectively). Time to initial transfusion, regardless of location (prehospital or during hospitalization), was associated with reduced 24-hour mortality only up to 15 minutes after MEDEVAC rescue (median, 36 minutes after injury; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.73], P = .02; there were 2 deaths among 62 recipients vs 68 deaths among 324 delayed transfusion recipients or nonrecipients).
Among medically evacuated US military combat causalities in Afghanistan, blood product transfusion prehospital or within minutes of injury was associated with greater 24-hour and 30-day survival than delayed transfusion or no transfusion. The findings support prehospital transfusion in this setting.
由于证据质量不佳和成本问题,创伤救治中的院前血液制品输注仍存在争议。2012年后向部署的军事医疗后送(MEDEVAC)单位逐步扩大输血能力,使得一项同期队列研究能够聚焦于初始输血的时机和地点。
探讨院前输血及初始输血时间与损伤存活的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:对2012年4月1日至2015年8月7日期间在阿富汗的美军战斗伤亡人员进行回顾性队列研究。符合条件的患者由MEDEVAC从受伤点成功救回,符合以下任一情况:(1)膝关节或肘关节及以上的创伤性肢体截肢;(2)休克,定义为收缩压低于90 mmHg或心率大于120次/分钟。
院前输血的启动以及从MEDEVAC救援到首次输血的时间,无论地点(即住院前或住院期间)。将输血接受者与输血延迟或未输血的非接受者(未暴露)进行比较。
MEDEVAC救援后24小时和30天的死亡率为共同主要结局。为平衡损伤严重程度,未进行院前输血的非接受者按损伤机制、院前休克、肢体截肢严重程度、头部损伤和躯干出血情况与接受者进行频数匹配。Cox回归按匹配组进行分层,并对年龄、损伤年份、运输团队、止血带使用情况以及MEDEVAC救援时间进行调整。
在502例患者中(中位年龄25岁[四分位间距22至29岁];98%为男性),55例院前输血接受者中有3例(5%),447例非接受者中有85例(19%)在MEDEVAC救援后24小时内死亡(组间差异为-14%[95%CI,-21%至-6%];P = 0.01)。到第30天,6例接受者(11%)和102例非接受者(23%)死亡(组间差异为-12%[95%CI,-21%至-2%];P = 0.04)。在匹配组内400例患者中的386例无缺失协变量数据的患者中,院前输血相关死亡的调整后风险比在24小时内为0.26(95%CI,0.08至0.84,P = 0.02)(54例接受者中有3例死亡,332例匹配的非接受者中有67例死亡),在30天内为0.39(95%CI,0.16至0.92,P = 0.03)(分别为6例和76例死亡)。无论地点(院前或住院期间),初始输血时间仅在MEDEVAC救援后15分钟内与24小时死亡率降低相关(损伤后中位时间36分钟;调整后风险比0.17[95%CI,0.04至0.73],P = 0.02;62例接受者中有2例死亡,324例输血延迟接受者或非接受者中有68例死亡)。
在阿富汗接受医疗后送的美军战斗伤亡人员中,院前或受伤后数分钟内进行血液制品输注比延迟输血或不输血与更高的24小时和30天存活率相关。这些发现支持在此情况下进行院前输血。