Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Children's Health and Environment, Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Ann Glob Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;80(4):286-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Waste from end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment, known as e-waste, is a rapidly growing global problem. E-waste contains valuable materials that have an economic value when recycled. Unfortunately, the majority of e-waste is recycled in the unregulated informal sector and results in significant risk for toxic exposures to the recyclers, who are frequently women and children.
The aim of this study was to document the extent of the problems associated with inappropriate e-waste recycling practices.
This was a narrative review that highlighted where e-waste is generated, where it is recycled, the range of adverse environmental exposures, the range of adverse health consequences, and the policy frameworks that are intended to protect vulnerable populations from inappropriate e-waste recycling practices.
The amount of e-waste being generated is increasing rapidly and is compounded by both illegal exportation and inappropriate donation of electronic equipment, especially computers, from developed to developing countries. As little as 25% of e-waste is recycled in formal recycling centers with adequate worker protection. The health consequences of both direct exposures during recycling and indirect exposures through environmental contamination are potentially severe but poorly studied. Policy frameworks aimed at protecting vulnerable populations exist but are not effectively applied.
E-waste recycling is necessary but it should be conducted in a safe and standardized manor. The acceptable risk thresholds for hazardous, secondary e-waste substances should not be different for developing and developed countries. However, the acceptable thresholds should be different for children and adults given the physical differences and pronounced vulnerabilities of children. Improving occupational conditions for all e-waste workers and striving for the eradication of child labor is non-negotiable.
报废的电子电气设备废弃物,即电子垃圾,是一个迅速增长的全球性问题。电子垃圾中含有有经济价值的材料,这些材料在回收后具有经济价值。不幸的是,大部分电子垃圾是在无监管的非正式部门回收的,这对回收者造成了严重的有毒物质暴露风险,而这些回收者通常是妇女和儿童。
本研究旨在记录与不适当的电子垃圾回收做法相关的问题的严重程度。
这是一项叙述性综述,强调了电子垃圾产生的地点、回收的地点、各种不利的环境暴露、各种不利的健康后果,以及旨在保护弱势群体免受不适当的电子垃圾回收做法影响的政策框架。
电子垃圾的产生量正在迅速增加,这是非法出口和不适当捐赠电子设备(尤其是计算机)的结果,从发达国家到发展中国家都存在这种情况。只有 25%的电子垃圾在有充分工人保护的正规回收中心进行回收。回收过程中的直接暴露以及通过环境污染的间接暴露所带来的健康后果可能非常严重,但研究不足。旨在保护弱势群体的政策框架虽然存在,但并未得到有效执行。
电子垃圾回收是必要的,但应该以安全和标准化的方式进行。对于发展中国家和发达国家来说,危险的、二次电子垃圾物质的可接受风险阈值不应有所不同。然而,鉴于儿童的身体差异和明显的脆弱性,对于儿童和成人来说,可接受的阈值应该有所不同。改善所有电子垃圾工人的职业条件,并努力消除童工,这是不可协商的。