Gonzalez-Rosa Javier J, Natali Fabrizio, Tettamanti Andrea, Cursi Marco, Velikova Svetla, Comi Giancarlo, Gatti Roberto, Leocani Letizia
Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Laboratory of Movement Analysis, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Mar 15;281:290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.
运动想象(MI)和动作观察(AO)被认为是运动学习的有效认知工具,但很少有研究直接比较它们与后续表现相关的皮质激活情况。我们使用脑电图(EEG)和运动学分析,比较了AO和MI在促进复杂的四肢手足协调任务早期学习中的作用。30名健康受试者被随机分为三组,进行一个训练阶段,其中AO组观看任务视频,MI组进行任务想象,对照组(C)参与一项分散注意力的计算任务。然后要求受试者实际执行运动任务,并对相对于正确运动表现的误差时间进行运动学测量。在基线、训练和任务执行期间记录EEG,并计算与静息状态相比,感觉运动(α和β)节律的任务相关功率(TRPow)。在训练期间,AO组在额中央和双侧顶叶区域的α去同步化比MI组和C组更强。然而,在任务执行期间,AO组在双侧顶叶区域的β同步化比MI组和C组更大。这种β同步化与运动学误差的相关性也最强,且AO组的运动学误差也显著低于MI组。这些数据表明,动作观察引发的感觉运动激活根据运动表现增强了运动学习,这对应于任务执行期间皮质资源的更有效激活。在促进新的复杂协调任务的早期学习方面,动作观察可能比运动想象更有效。