Kroese E Dinant, Bosgra Sieto, Buist Harrie E, Lewin Geertje, van der Linden Sander C, Man Hai-yen, Piersma Aldert H, Rorije Emiel, Schulpen Sjors H W, Schwarz Michael, Uibel Frederik, van Vugt-Lussenburg Barbara M A, Wolterbeek Andre P M, van der Burg Bart
TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands.
TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Reprod Toxicol. 2015 Aug 1;55:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
Previously we showed a battery consisting of CALUX transcriptional activation assays, the ReProGlo assay, and the embryonic stem cell test, and zebrafish embryotoxicity assay as 'apical' tests to correctly predict developmental toxicity for 11 out of 12 compounds, and to explain the one false negative [7]. Here we report on applying this battery within the context of grouping and read across, put forward as a potential tool to fill data gaps and avoid animal testing, to distinguish in vivo non- or weak developmental toxicants from potent developmental toxicants within groups of structural analogs. The battery correctly distinguished 2-methylhexanoic acid, monomethyl phthalate, and monobutyltin trichloride as non- or weak developmental toxicants from structurally related developmental toxicants valproic acid, mono-ethylhexyl phthalate, and tributyltin chloride, respectively, and, therefore, holds promise as a biological verification model in grouping and read across approaches. The relevance of toxicokinetic information is indicated.
此前,我们展示了一组试验,包括化学激活荧光素酶基因表达试验(CALUX)、ReProGlo试验、胚胎干细胞试验以及斑马鱼胚胎毒性试验,作为“顶端”试验,这些试验能正确预测12种化合物中11种的发育毒性,并解释了其中一个假阴性结果[7]。在此,我们报告在分组和类推的背景下应用这组试验,将其作为填补数据空白和避免动物试验的潜在工具,以区分结构类似物组内的体内非发育毒性或弱发育毒性物质与强发育毒性物质。该组试验正确地将2-甲基己酸、邻苯二甲酸单甲酯和三氯化一丁基锡分别与结构相关的发育毒性物质丙戊酸、邻苯二甲酸单-2-乙基己酯和三丁基氯化锡区分开来,认定其为非发育毒性或弱发育毒性物质,因此,有望作为分组和类推方法中的生物学验证模型。文中还指出了毒代动力学信息的相关性。