Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, CAAT-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
ALTEX. 2020;37(4):579-606. doi: 10.14573/altex.1912181. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
Read-across (RAx) translates available information from well-characterized chemicals to a substance for which there is a toxicological data gap. The OECD is working on case studies to probe general applicability of RAx, and several regulations (e.g., EU-REACH) already allow this procedure to be used to waive new in vivo tests. The decision to prepare a review on the state of the art of RAx as a tool for risk assessment for regulatory purposes was taken during a workshop with international experts in Ranco, Italy in July 2018. Three major issues were identified that need optimization to allow a higher regulatory acceptance rate of the RAx procedure: (i) the definition of similarity of source and target, (ii) the translation of biological/toxicological activity of source to target in the RAx procedure, and (iii) how to deal with issues of ADME that may differ between source and target. The use of new approach methodologies (NAM) was discussed as one of the most important innovations to improve the acceptability of RAx. At present, NAM data may be used to confirm chemical and toxicological similarity. In the future, the use of NAM may be broadened to fully characterize the hazard and toxicokinetic properties of RAx compounds. Concerning available guidance, documents on Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) and on best practices to perform and evaluate the RAx process were identified. Here, in particular, the RAx guidance, being worked out by the European Commission’s H2020 project EU-ToxRisk together with many external partners with regulatory experience, is given.
阅读跨越(RAx)将可获得的信息从特征良好的化学物质转化为毒理学数据空白的物质。OECD 正在进行案例研究,以探究 RAx 的普遍适用性,并且有几个法规(例如欧盟-REACH)已经允许使用该程序来免除新的体内测试。在 2018 年 7 月于意大利兰科举行的一次国际专家研讨会上,决定编写一份关于 RAx 作为监管目的风险评估工具的最新技术状态的审查。确定了三个需要优化的主要问题,以允许更高的监管接受 RAx 程序的比率:(i)源和目标相似性的定义,(ii)在 RAx 程序中源的生物/毒理学活性向目标的转化,以及(iii)如何处理源和目标之间可能存在的 ADME 问题。讨论了使用新方法学(NAM)作为提高 RAx 可接受性的最重要创新之一。目前,NAM 数据可用于确认化学和毒理学相似性。将来,可能会扩大 NAM 的使用范围,以充分描述 RAx 化合物的危害和毒代动力学特性。关于现有的指导,确定了关于良好 RAx 实践(GRAP)和执行和评估 RAx 过程的最佳实践的文件。在这里,特别是给出了由欧盟委员会 H2020 项目 EU-ToxRisk 与许多具有监管经验的外部合作伙伴共同制定的 RAx 指南。