van Meer Peter J K, Ebbers Hans C, Kooijman Marlous, Gispen-de Wied Christine C, Silva-Lima Beatriz, Moors Ellen H M, Schellekens Huub
Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of pharmaceutics, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrech, The Netherlands; Medicines Evaluation Board, Graadt van Roggenweg 500, 3531 AH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of pharmaceutics, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrech, The Netherlands.
Drug Discov Today. 2015 Apr;20(4):483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
The European Union (EU) was the first region to establish a regulatory framework for biosimilars, in which animal studies are required to confirm similarity to a reference product. However, animal studies described in European public assessment reports (EPARs) or marketing authorization applications (MAAs) did not identify clinically or toxicologically relevant differences despite differences in quality, suggesting that animal studies lack the sensitivity to confirm biosimilarity. Scientific advice provided learning opportunities to evolve existing guidance. Altogether, the data support a step-wise approach to develop biosimilars that focuses on quality and clinical efficacy of biosimilar. This approach might be more effective and does not necessarily require animal studies, which is also reflected in new EU draft guidance.
欧盟是首个为生物类似药建立监管框架的地区,该框架要求进行动物研究以确认与参照产品的相似性。然而,欧洲公共评估报告(EPARs)或上市许可申请(MAAs)中描述的动物研究并未发现质量上存在差异的情况下在临床或毒理学方面有相关差异,这表明动物研究缺乏确认生物相似性的敏感性。科学建议提供了改进现有指南的学习机会。总体而言,这些数据支持一种逐步开发生物类似药的方法,该方法侧重于生物类似药的质量和临床疗效。这种方法可能更有效,且不一定需要动物研究,这一点也体现在欧盟新的指南草案中。