Hughes-Large Jennifer M, Pang Dominic K T, Robson Debra L, Chan Pak, Toma Jelena, Borradaile Nica M
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada.
Atherosclerosis. 2014 Dec;237(2):696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.10.090. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Niacin (nicotinic acid) as a monotherapy can reduce vascular disease risk, but its mechanism of action remains controversial, and may not be dependent on systemic lipid modifying effects. Niacin has recently been shown to improve endothelial function and vascular regeneration, independent of correcting dyslipidemia, in rodent models of vascular injury and metabolic disease. As a potential biosynthetic precursor for NAD(+), niacin could elicit these vascular benefits through NAD(+)-dependent, sirtuin (SIRT) mediated responses. Alternatively, niacin may act through its receptor, GPR109A, to promote endothelial function, though endothelial cells are not known to express this receptor. We hypothesized that niacin directly improves endothelial cell function during exposure to lipotoxic conditions and sought to determine the potential mechanism(s) involved.
Angiogenic function in excess palmitate was assessed by tube formation following treatment of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) with either a relatively low concentration of niacin (10 μM), or nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) (1 μM), a direct NAD(+) precursor. Although both niacin and NMN improved HMVEC tube formation during palmitate overload, only NMN increased cellular NAD(+) and SIRT1 activity. We further observed that HMVEC express GRP109A. Activation of this receptor with either acifran or MK-1903 recapitulated niacin-induced improvements in HMVEC tube formation, while GPR109A siRNA diminished the effect of niacin.
Niacin, at a low concentration, improves HMVEC angiogenic function under lipotoxic conditions, likely independent of NAD(+) biosynthesis and SIRT1 activation, but rather through niacin receptor activation.
烟酸作为单一疗法可降低血管疾病风险,但其作用机制仍存在争议,可能不依赖于全身脂质调节作用。最近在血管损伤和代谢疾病的啮齿动物模型中发现,烟酸可改善内皮功能和血管再生,且与纠正血脂异常无关。作为烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(NAD⁺)的潜在生物合成前体,烟酸可能通过NAD⁺依赖性、沉默调节蛋白(SIRT)介导的反应产生这些血管益处。另外,烟酸可能通过其受体GPR109A发挥作用以促进内皮功能,尽管内皮细胞并不表达该受体。我们假设烟酸在暴露于脂毒性条件下时可直接改善内皮细胞功能,并试图确定其中涉及的潜在机制。
用相对低浓度的烟酸(10 μM)或烟酰胺单核苷酸(NMN,一种直接的NAD⁺前体)处理人微血管内皮细胞(HMVEC)后,通过管腔形成评估在过量棕榈酸酯存在下的血管生成功能。尽管烟酸和NMN在棕榈酸酯过载期间均改善了HMVEC的管腔形成,但只有NMN增加了细胞内NAD⁺和SIRT1活性。我们进一步观察到HMVEC表达GRP109A。用阿昔呋喃或MK - 1903激活该受体可重现烟酸诱导的HMVEC管腔形成改善,而GPR109A小干扰RNA则减弱了烟酸的作用。
低浓度的烟酸在脂毒性条件下可改善HMVEC的血管生成功能,可能不依赖于NAD⁺生物合成和SIRT1激活,而是通过烟酸受体激活实现。