Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR M101 AMURE, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Ifremer, Unité d'Economie Maritime, UMR M101 AMURE, Technopole de Brest-Iroise, CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Feb 1;149:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Cooperation between the social and natural sciences has become essential in order to encompass all the dimensions of coastal zone management. Socio-economic approaches are increasingly recommended to complement integrated assessment in support of these initiatives. A systematic review of the academic literature was carried out in order to analyze the main types of socio-economic assessments used to inform the coastal zone management process as well as their effectiveness. A corpus of 1682 articles published between 1992 and 2011 was identified by means of the representative coverage approach, from which 170 were selected by applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and then classified using a content analysis methodology. The percentage of articles that mention the use of socio-economic assessment in support of coastal zone management initiatives is increasing but remains relatively low. The review examines the links between the issues addressed by integrated assessments and the chosen analytical frameworks as well as the various economic assessment methods which are used in the successive steps of the coastal zone management process. The results show that i) analytical frameworks such as 'risk and vulnerability', 'DPSIR', 'valuation', 'ecosystem services' and 'preferences' are likely to lead to effective integration of social sciences in coastal zone management research while 'integration', 'sustainability' and 'participation' remain difficult to operationalize, ii) risk assessments are insufficiently implemented in developing countries, and iii) indicator systems in support of multi-criteria analyses could be used during more stages of the coastal zone management process. Finally, it is suggested that improved collaboration between science and management would require that scientists currently involved in coastal zone management processes further educate themselves in integrated assessment approaches and participatory methodologies.
为了涵盖沿海地区管理的所有层面,社会科学与自然科学之间的合作已经成为必要。社会经济方法越来越多地被推荐用于补充综合评估,以支持这些举措。进行了一次系统的文献综述,以分析用于为沿海地区管理过程提供信息的主要社会经济评估类型及其有效性。通过代表性覆盖方法确定了 1992 年至 2011 年间发表的 1682 篇文章的语料库,通过应用纳入/排除标准从中选择了 170 篇文章,并使用内容分析方法对其进行了分类。提及在支持沿海地区管理举措方面使用社会经济评估的文章的百分比在增加,但仍然相对较低。该综述审查了综合评估所涉及的问题与所选择的分析框架之间的联系,以及在沿海地区管理过程的连续步骤中使用的各种经济评估方法。结果表明:i)分析框架,如“风险和脆弱性”、“DPSIR”、“评估”、“生态系统服务”和“偏好”,可能会导致社会科学在沿海地区管理研究中的有效整合,而“整合”、“可持续性”和“参与”仍然难以实施;ii)风险评估在发展中国家的实施不足;iii)支持多标准分析的指标系统可在沿海地区管理过程的更多阶段使用。最后,建议科学与管理之间的更好合作需要当前参与沿海地区管理过程的科学家进一步接受综合评估方法和参与性方法的教育。