Isogai Toshiaki, Yasunaga Hideo, Matsui Hiroki, Tanaka Hiroyuki, Ueda Tetsuro, Horiguchi Hiromasa, Fushimi Kiyohide
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, 2-8-29 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8524, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.070. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
No previous nationwide study has examined whether there is a 'weekend effect' of higher mortality after admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is easily accessible.
Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan, we identified AMI patients aged ≥20 years who were admitted to acute care hospitals between July 1, 2010 and March 31, 2013. Multivariable regression models fitted with generalized estimating equations were used to determine the association between weekend admission and in-hospital mortality. Eligible patients were also classified into subgroups according to Killip class at admission.
Of 111,200 eligible patients, 30,847 patients were admitted on weekends and 80,353 patients on weekdays. Overall, the in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for weekend admission than for weekday admission (13.6% versus 11.4%; P<0.001; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.222; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.172 to 1.274), despite the higher rate of PCI performed on the day of admission (68.9% versus 64.8%; P<0.001). The association remained significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics, invasive procedures, and medications (adjusted OR 1.144, 95% CI 1.079 to 1.214). In subgroup analyses, the effect of weekend admission remained significant in the Killip II to IV subgroups, but became insignificant in the Killip I subgroup (adjusted OR 1.002, 95% CI 0.828 to 1.213).
This study showed that weekend admission for AMI was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality even in a setting where PCI was highly available.
以往尚无全国性研究探讨在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)容易获得的情况下,急性心肌梗死(AMI)入院后较高死亡率的“周末效应”是否存在。
利用日本诊断程序组合住院患者数据库,我们确定了2010年7月1日至2013年3月31日期间入住急症医院的年龄≥20岁的AMI患者。采用拟合广义估计方程的多变量回归模型来确定周末入院与院内死亡率之间的关联。符合条件的患者还根据入院时的Killip分级分为亚组。
在111,200例符合条件的患者中,30,847例在周末入院,80,353例在工作日入院。总体而言,周末入院的院内死亡率显著高于工作日入院(13.6%对11.4%;P<0.001;未调整优势比[OR]1.222;95%置信区间[CI]1.172至1.274),尽管入院当天进行PCI的比例较高(68.9%对64.8%;P<0.001)。在调整基线特征、侵入性操作和药物治疗后,该关联仍然显著(调整后OR 1.144,95%CI 1.079至1.214)。在亚组分析中,周末入院的影响在Killip II至IV亚组中仍然显著,但在Killip I亚组中变得不显著(调整后OR 1.002,95%CI 0.828至1.213)。
本研究表明,即使在PCI可及性很高的情况下,AMI周末入院也与较高的院内死亡率显著相关。