• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图形理解中的表面结构和深层结构。

Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension.

作者信息

Schnotz Wolfgang, Baadte Christiane

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany,

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2015 May;43(4):605-18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0490-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-014-0490-2
PMID:25465898
Abstract

Comprehension of graphics can be considered as a process of schema-mediated structure mapping from external graphics on internal mental models. Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that graphics possess a perceptible surface structure as well as a semantic deep structure both of which affect mental model construction. The same content was presented to different groups of learners by graphics from different perspectives with different surface structures but the same deep structure. Deep structures were complementary: major features of the learning content in one experiment became minor features in the other experiment, and vice versa. Text was held constant. Participants were asked to read, understand, and memorize the learning material. Furthermore, they were either instructed to process the material from the perspective supported by the graphic or from an alternative perspective, or they received no further instruction. After learning, they were asked to recall the learning content from different perspectives by completing graphs of different formats as accurately as possible. Learners' recall was more accurate if the format of recall was the same as the learning format which indicates surface structure influences. However, participants also showed more accurate recall when they remembered the content from a perspective emphasizing the deep structure, regardless of the graphics format presented before. This included better recall of what they had not seen than of what they really had seen before. That is, deep structure effects overrode surface effects. Depending on context conditions, stimulation of additional cognitive processing by instruction had partially positive and partially negative effects.

摘要

对图形的理解可以被视为一个从外部图形到内部心理模型的图式介导的结构映射过程。进行了两项实验来检验这一假设,即图形具有可感知的表面结构和语义深层结构,这两者都会影响心理模型的构建。相同的内容以具有不同表面结构但相同深层结构的图形从不同角度呈现给不同的学习者群体。深层结构是互补的:在一个实验中学习内容的主要特征在另一个实验中变成了次要特征,反之亦然。文本保持不变。要求参与者阅读、理解并记忆学习材料。此外,他们要么被指示从图形支持的角度处理材料,要么从另一个角度处理,要么没有得到进一步的指示。学习后,要求他们通过尽可能准确地完成不同格式的图形,从不同角度回忆学习内容。如果回忆的格式与学习格式相同,学习者的回忆会更准确,这表明表面结构有影响。然而,当参与者从强调深层结构的角度记住内容时,无论之前呈现的图形格式如何,他们的回忆也更准确。这包括对他们之前未见过的内容的回忆比对他们真正见过的内容的回忆更好。也就是说,深层结构效应超越了表面效应。根据上下文条件,通过指令刺激额外的认知加工有部分积极和部分消极的影响。

相似文献

1
Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension.图形理解中的表面结构和深层结构。
Mem Cognit. 2015 May;43(4):605-18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0490-2.
2
[Influence of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during picture and text comprehension].[可视化类型对图片与文本理解过程中心智模型构建的影响]
Z Exp Psychol. 1999;46(3):217-36.
3
Visual similarity in short-term recall for where and when.关于地点和时间的短期记忆中的视觉相似性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Mar;61(3):353-60. doi: 10.1080/17470210701634537.
4
Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration.目光注视时间所体现的诱惑细节的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Mar;109:131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
5
Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing.物体的形状和方向通常不会影响语言处理过程中的表现。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2218-25. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490746. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text.元理解判断反映了这样一种信念,即图表可以提高从文本中学习的效果。
Memory. 2010 Oct;18(7):698-711. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.506441. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.情绪会影响文本处理和理解吗?一项眼动研究的证据。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Sep;85(3):387-406. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12080. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Verbal descriptions of spatial information can interfere with picture processing.言语描述空间信息会干扰图片处理。
Memory. 2012;20(7):682-99. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.693935. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
9
Does Extra Interletter Spacing Help Text Reading in Skilled Adult Readers?额外的字母间距对熟练的成年读者的文本阅读有帮助吗?
Span J Psychol. 2016 May 23;19:E26. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.28.
10
EFL Learners' Levels of Comprehension Across Text Structures: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Descriptive and Enumerative Expository Texts.不同文本结构下英语学习者的理解水平:描述性和列举性说明文的字面理解与推理理解比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Dec;45(6):1499-1513. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9414-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Findings from the expert-novice paradigm on differential response behavior among multiple-choice items of a pedagogical content knowledge test - implications for test development.教学内容知识测试多项选择题中专家-新手范式关于差异反应行为的研究结果——对测试开发的启示
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1240120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240120. eCollection 2023.
2
Multiple mental representations in picture processing.图片加工中的多重心理表象。
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):903-918. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01541-2. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
When Words and Graphs Move the Eyes: The Processing of Multimodal Causal Relations.

本文引用的文献

1
The time course of information extraction from instructional diagrams.从教学图中提取信息的时间进程。
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Dec;115(3):677-701. doi: 10.2466/22.23.PMS.115.6.677-701.
2
Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: what matters is what you see, not whether you interact.借助外部可视化进行空间推理:重要的是你看到了什么,而不是你是否进行了交互。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1099-132. doi: 10.1080/03640210801898177.
3
Discourse comprehension.语篇理解
当文字和图表吸引目光时:多模态因果关系的处理
J Eye Mov Res. 2018 Mar 9;11(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.11.1.5.
4
Epistemic Network Analyses of Economics Students' Graph Understanding: An Eye-Tracking Study.经济专业学生图形理解的认知网络分析:一项眼动研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;20(23):6908. doi: 10.3390/s20236908.
Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:163-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163.
4
Reasoning, models, and images: behavioral measures and cortical activity.推理、模型与图像:行为测量与皮层活动
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):559-73. doi: 10.1162/089892903321662949.
5
Visual imagery can impede reasoning.视觉意象会妨碍推理。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):363-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03194937.
6
Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study.演绎推理中的空间意象:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):203-12. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00116-1.
7
Visual routines.视觉程序
Cognition. 1984 Dec;18(1-3):97-159. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90023-4.