• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从教学图中提取信息的时间进程。

The time course of information extraction from instructional diagrams.

机构信息

Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Dec;115(3):677-701. doi: 10.2466/22.23.PMS.115.6.677-701.

DOI:10.2466/22.23.PMS.115.6.677-701
PMID:23409583
Abstract

This study investigated which information is extracted from a brief glance at an instructional diagram to assess its possible contribution for learning with text and diagrams. An experimental paradigm from scene perception research was used to study diagrams. University students (N = 20) saw pictures showing a scene or instructional diagrams for four different presentation times (50 msec. vs 250 msec. vs 1,000 msec. vs 3,000 msec.). Following presentation of a picture or diagram, respectively, participants were asked to verify a statement about its gist, details, and the functioning (for diagrams only). Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to analyze verification accuracy for statements about gist, details, and the functioning as well as the eye movements (i.e., fixation durations and saccade amplitudes) during picture inspection. In both scenes and instructional diagrams, gist but not details were accurately identified from a first glance at the picture (i.e., at 50 msec. and 250 msec.). In contrast, verification accuracy for gist and details increased at a slower rate in instructional diagrams than in scene pictures over presentation times. Moreover, the characteristic function of increasing fixation durations with increasing inspection time was found in scenes, but not in instructional diagrams. Taken together, results suggest that both types of illustrations are processed differently at longer inspection times; however, patterns of early information extraction are similar, namely that the gist but far less information about details is extracted. Results imply people are able to extract an instructional diagram's global spatial structure from a first glance, which may be helpful to learning from text.

摘要

本研究旨在探究在短暂浏览教学图表时,人们会提取哪些信息,以评估其对文本和图表学习可能产生的影响。我们采用场景感知研究中的实验范式来研究图表。共有 20 名大学生参与了实验,他们观看了展示场景或教学图表的图片,呈现时间分别为 50 毫秒、250 毫秒、1000 毫秒和 3000 毫秒。在呈现图片或图表后,参与者需分别对图片或图表主旨、细节和功能(仅针对图表)的相关陈述进行验证。我们使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来分析主旨、细节和功能相关陈述的验证准确性以及图片检查过程中的眼动(即注视持续时间和眼跳幅度)。无论是场景图片还是教学图表,人们都能在第一眼(即 50 毫秒和 250 毫秒)快速准确地识别出主旨,但无法准确识别细节。相比之下,在教学图表中,主旨和细节的验证准确性在呈现时间内的增加速度慢于场景图片。此外,我们在场景图片中发现了注视持续时间随检查时间增加而增加的特征函数,但在教学图表中并未发现。综合来看,结果表明两种类型的插图在较长的检查时间内会被以不同的方式处理;然而,早期信息提取的模式是相似的,即人们可以从第一眼快速提取图表的全局空间结构,这可能有助于从文本中学习。

相似文献

1
The time course of information extraction from instructional diagrams.从教学图中提取信息的时间进程。
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Dec;115(3):677-701. doi: 10.2466/22.23.PMS.115.6.677-701.
2
Describing scenes hardly seen.描绘罕见场景。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jun;125(2):129-43. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
3
The influence of color on the perception of scene gist.颜色对场景主旨感知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):660-75. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660.
4
Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes.物体识别是否需要注意力?来自对现实场景观察期间眼动的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):159-70. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
5
Confirming statements about pictures of natural scenes: evidence of the processing of gist from eye movements.关于自然场景图片的确认陈述:来自眼动的gist加工证据
Perception. 2005;34(9):1069-82. doi: 10.1068/p5246.
6
The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition.信息局部化在场景主旨识别中的重要性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1431-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1431.
7
Verbal descriptions of spatial information can interfere with picture processing.言语描述空间信息会干扰图片处理。
Memory. 2012;20(7):682-99. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.693935. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
8
Improving Soccer Knowledge From Computerized Game Diagrams: Benefits of Sequential Instructional Arrows.从电脑化的比赛示意图中提升足球知识:顺序教学箭头的好处。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Apr;128(2):912-931. doi: 10.1177/0031512520983083. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Influence of a psychological perspective on scene viewing and memory for scenes.心理学视角对场景观看及场景记忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1372-87. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.548872.
10
The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.场景上下文和目标特征对场景视觉搜索的相对贡献。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1283-97. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1283.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple mental representations in picture processing.图片加工中的多重心理表象。
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):903-918. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01541-2. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension.图形理解中的表面结构和深层结构。
Mem Cognit. 2015 May;43(4):605-18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0490-2.