Belotti Angelo, Doni Elisa, Bolis Silvia, Rossini Fausto, Casaroli Ivana, Pezzatti Sara, Pogliani Enrico Maria, Pioltelli Pietro Enrico
Division of Hematology, Ospedale San Gerardo - Università degli Studi Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Division of Hematology, Ospedale San Gerardo - Università degli Studi Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Apr;15(4):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is an aggressive lymphoma and a large number of studies have therefore focused on the search for prognostic factors. The same interest concerns FL, for which identification of patients candidates for watch and wait (W&W) strategy is still an option. Studies about the number and type of lymphocytes and monocytes detectable in patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas indicate they might affect the pathogenesis and prognosis of these diseases. LMR is recently under investigation as a new prognostic parameter in DLBCL; the role of this ratio in FL in the rituximab era is unknown.
We retrospectively analyzed 137 DLBCL and 132 FL patients referred to our institution; among FL pts, a W&W approach was performed at diagnosis for 42 patients. The remaining patients were treated with rituximab-containing therapy. We analyzed different LMR cutoff values at diagnosis and we wanted to investigate the prognostic effect among DLBCL and FL.
We found that the most discriminative LMR was 2.4 for DLBCL and 2 for FL. Among DLBCL patients, an LMR value < 2.4 was associated with a worse 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and we observed no difference in overall survival and complete response rate. Considering FL patients, LMR > 2 was associated with a longer time to treatment start compared with the LMR < 2 group (P = .0096). Among the 92 patients treated with rituximab chemotherapy, 2-year PFS was superior in the LMR > 2 group.
LMR at diagnosis is a simple tool to better define long-term outcome of DLBCL and FL patients. The use of this tool might better define selection in FL of ideal candidates for W&W strategy.
弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤是一种侵袭性淋巴瘤,因此大量研究聚焦于寻找预后因素。对于滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)也有同样的研究兴趣,确定适合观察等待(W&W)策略的患者仍是一个选择。关于霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中可检测到的淋巴细胞和单核细胞数量及类型的研究表明,它们可能影响这些疾病的发病机制和预后。淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)最近作为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的一个新的预后参数受到研究;在利妥昔单抗时代,该比值在滤泡性淋巴瘤中的作用尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了转诊至我院的137例弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者和132例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者;在滤泡性淋巴瘤患者中,42例在诊断时采用了观察等待方法。其余患者接受含利妥昔单抗的治疗。我们分析了诊断时不同的LMR临界值,并想研究其在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤和滤泡性淋巴瘤中的预后作用。
我们发现,弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤最具鉴别性的LMR为2.4,滤泡性淋巴瘤为2。在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,LMR值<2.4与较差的2年无进展生存期(PFS)相关,且我们未观察到总生存期和完全缓解率有差异。考虑滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,与LMR<2组相比,LMR>2与开始治疗的时间更长相关(P = 0.0096)。在92例接受利妥昔单抗化疗的患者中,LMR>2组的2年PFS更佳。
诊断时的LMR是更好地确定弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤和滤泡性淋巴瘤患者长期预后的一个简单工具。使用该工具可能更好地确定滤泡性淋巴瘤中适合观察等待策略的理想候选者。