• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延迟脐带结扎、新生儿血细胞比容与阿氏评分:一项随机对照试验

Late umbilical cord clamping, neonatal hematocrit and Apgar scores: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Salari Z, Rezapour M, Khalili N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

General Practitioner, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014;7(4):287-91. doi: 10.3233/NPM-1463913.

DOI:10.3233/NPM-1463913
PMID:25468616
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Based on current evidence, there is a little agreement on the best timing for after birth umbilical cord clamping. This study was designed to compare the impact of using two different times for cord clamping on hematocrit concentration and Apgar scores of the neonate.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-six healthy full-term vaginally born neonates were allocated to early (10 seconds after delivery) and late (3 minutes after delivery) umbilical cord clamping groups in this randomized clinical trial. We recorded the length of the 3rd stage of labor and Apgar score at 5 minutes. Infant's hematocrit was measured at 2 and 18 hours of age.

RESULTS

Neonatal hematocrit differed between the two groups. Late cord clamping group had greater hematocrit at 2 hours (45.5 ± 4 vs. 49.5 ± 4.4, P = 0.0003) and 18 hours (47.7 ± 5.5 vs. 52.9 ± 4.3, P = 0.0002). Apgar scores at 5 minutes (9.3 ± 0.6 vs. 9.4 ± 0.6, p = 0.5) and duration of delivery 3rd stage (10.2 ± 3.7 min vs. 8.9 ± 5 min, P = 0.2) did not differ between early and late cord clamping groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

Late cord clamping leads to a significant increase in the hematocrit of the neonate but it does not have effects on Apgar score and duration of the 3rd stage of labor.

摘要

目的

基于当前证据,对于出生后脐带结扎的最佳时机,人们几乎没有达成共识。本研究旨在比较两种不同脐带结扎时间对新生儿血细胞比容浓度和阿氏评分的影响。

研究设计

在这项随机临床试验中,56名健康的足月阴道分娩新生儿被分配到早期(分娩后10秒)和晚期(分娩后3分钟)脐带结扎组。我们记录了第三产程的时长以及5分钟时的阿氏评分。在婴儿2小时和18小时大时测量其血细胞比容。

结果

两组新生儿的血细胞比容存在差异。晚期脐带结扎组在2小时时的血细胞比容更高(45.5±4对49.5±4.4,P = 0.0003),在18小时时也是如此(47.7±5.5对52.9±4.3,P = 0.0002)。早期和晚期脐带结扎组5分钟时的阿氏评分(9.3±0.6对9.4±0.6,p = 0.5)以及第三产程的时长(10.2±3.7分钟对8.9±5分钟,P = 0.2)分别无差异。

结论

晚期脐带结扎会导致新生儿血细胞比容显著升高,但对阿氏评分和第三产程时长没有影响。

相似文献

1
Late umbilical cord clamping, neonatal hematocrit and Apgar scores: a randomized controlled trial.延迟脐带结扎、新生儿血细胞比容与阿氏评分:一项随机对照试验
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014;7(4):287-91. doi: 10.3233/NPM-1463913.
2
The effect of early and late umbilical cord clamping on neonatal hematocrit.早期和晚期脐带结扎对新生儿血细胞比容的影响。
J Perinatol. 2008 Aug;28(8):523-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.55. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
3
The effect of timing of cord clamping on neonatal venous hematocrit values and clinical outcome at term: a randomized, controlled trial.足月时脐带结扎时间对新生儿静脉血细胞比容值及临床结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e779-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1156. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
4
Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.延迟与早期脐带夹闭在早产儿中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.231. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature neonates.延迟剪断早产儿的脐带。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120(2 Pt 1):325-30. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825f269f.
6
Effect of umbilical cord milking on morbidity and survival in extremely low gestational age neonates.脐带血采集对极低胎龄儿发病率和存活率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):519.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.037. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.足月儿脐带结扎时机对母婴结局的影响。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Jun;9(2):303-97. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1971.
8
Delayed cord clamping vs cord milking in elective cesarean delivery at term: a randomized controlled trial.择期剖宫产足月时延迟脐带夹闭与脐带挤奶的随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Mar;6(3):101279. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101279. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
Efficacy of Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Late Preterm Newborns following Normal Labor: A Randomized Control Trial.足月正常分娩后晚期早产儿延迟与即刻脐带结扎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S159-65.
10
Late vs early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.足月新生儿脐带延迟结扎与早期结扎的比较:对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1241-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1241.

引用本文的文献

1
[Interpretation of 2023 American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics focused update on neonatal resuscitation guidelines].《2023年美国心脏协会和美国儿科学会新生儿复苏指南重点更新解读》
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 15;26(1):25-30. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2311107.
2
Effects of timing of umbilical cord clamping for mother and newborn: a narrative review.脐带夹闭时机对母婴的影响:叙述性综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):47-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06990-1. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group.
2021 国际心肺复苏与紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队、急救工作组以及 COVID-19 工作组的总结。
Resuscitation. 2021 Dec;169:229-311. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.040. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 8. Neonatal resuscitation.《2020年韩国心肺复苏指南。第8部分。新生儿复苏》
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 May;8(S):S96-S115. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.028. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
The Effect of the Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping on Hemoglobin Levels, Neonatal Outcomes and Developmental Status in Infants at 4 Months Old.脐带结扎时机对4月龄婴儿血红蛋白水平、新生儿结局及发育状况的影响
Iran J Child Neurol. 2019 Winter;13(1):45-55.