Valentini M, Scardapane M, Bondanini F, Bossi A, Colatrella A, Girelli A, Ciucci A, Leotta S, Minotti E, Pasotti F, Pesenti A, Rocca L, Sciangula L, Vavassori E, Nicolucci A
Fondazione Mario Negri Sud , S. Maria Imbaro , Italy.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Mar;31(3):487-92. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.993025. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Adherence to insulin therapy can be threatened by pain and needle fear. This cross-over randomized non-inferiority trial evaluated a new Pic Insupen 33G × 4 mm needle vs. a 32G × 4 mm needle in terms of metabolic control, safety and acceptability in patients with diabetes treated with insulin.
We used a centralized, permuted block randomization, stratified by center and maximum insulin dose per single injection. Subjects used the two needles in two 3 week treatment periods. The primary endpoint was the absolute percentage variation of the blood fructosamine between the two treatments (% |ΔFru|). Additional endpoints were: glycemic variability, total insulin doses, body weight, severe hypoglycemic episodes, leakage at injection sites and pain measured by visual analogue scale. Equivalent glycemic control was defined a priori as % |ΔFru| (including 95% CI) within 20%.
Of 87 subjects randomized, 77 completed the study (median age 53.1 [IR 42.3-61.2], median BMI 24.3 Kg/m(2) [IR 21.3-28.5], median duration of insulin therapy [in months] 141.4 (IR 56.3-256.9), median baseline HbA1c 7.9% [IR 7.2-8.8]). The % |ΔFru| was 7.93% (95% CI 6.23-9.63), meeting the non-inferiority criterion. The fasting blood glucose standard deviation was 46.2 (mean 154.6) with the 33G needle and 42.8 (mean 157.3) with the 32G needle (p=0.42). Insulin daily dose and patients' weight did not show any statistically significant variation. We observed 95 episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia with the 33G needle and 96 with the 32G needle. One episode of severe hypoglycemia was documented in the latter group. As for insulin leakage we observed 37.55 episodes per 100 patient-days with the 33G needle and 32.21 episodes per 100 patient-days with the 32G needle (p=0.31). Patients reported less pain with the 33G × 4 mm needle (p=0.05).
Study sample was mainly composed of adults with type 1 diabetes and study was not blinded.
The 33G needle is not inferior to the 32G needle in terms of efficacy and safety, with reduced pain and no difference in insulin leakage.
NCT01745549.
疼痛和对针头的恐惧可能会影响胰岛素治疗的依从性。本交叉随机非劣效性试验比较了新型33G×4mm笔芯胰岛素笔用针头与32G×4mm针头在接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中的代谢控制情况、安全性及可接受性。
采用集中化、置换区组随机化方法,按中心和单次注射最大胰岛素剂量分层。受试者在两个为期3周的治疗期内分别使用两种针头。主要终点为两种治疗之间血果糖胺的绝对百分比变化(%|ΔFru|)。其他终点包括:血糖变异性、胰岛素总剂量、体重、严重低血糖事件、注射部位渗漏以及采用视觉模拟评分法测量的疼痛程度。等效血糖控制预先定义为%|ΔFru|(包括95%CI)在20%以内。
87名随机分组的受试者中,77名完成了研究(年龄中位数53.1岁[四分位间距42.3 - 61.2岁],体重指数中位数24.3kg/m²[四分位间距21.3 - 28.5kg/m²],胰岛素治疗时间中位数[月]141.4(四分位间距56.3 - 256.9),基线糖化血红蛋白中位数7.9%[四分位间距7.2 - 8.8])。%|ΔFru|为7.93%(95%CI 6.23 - 9.63),符合非劣效性标准。使用33G针头时空腹血糖标准差为46.2(均值154.6),使用32G针头时为42.8(均值157.3)(p = 0.42)。每日胰岛素剂量和患者体重未显示出任何统计学上的显著差异。使用33G针头观察到95次有症状低血糖事件,使用32G针头观察到96次。后一组记录到1次严重低血糖事件。至于胰岛素渗漏,使用33G针头时每100患者日观察到37.55次,使用32G针头时每100患者日观察到32.21次(p = 0.31)。患者报告使用33G×4mm针头时疼痛较轻(p = 0.05)。
研究样本主要由1型糖尿病成人组成,且研究未设盲。
33G针头在疗效和安全性方面不劣于32G针头,疼痛减轻且胰岛素渗漏无差异。
NCT01745549。