Suppr超能文献

新 34G×3.5mm 注射笔针头的疗效、安全性和可接受性:一项交叉随机非劣效性试验;AGO 02 研究。

Efficacy, safety and acceptability of the new pen needle 34G × 3.5 mm: a crossover randomized non-inferiority trial; AGO 02 study.

机构信息

a Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology - CORESEARCH , Pescara , Italy.

b Sandro Pertini Hospital, Roma , Italy.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Sep;34(9):1699-1704. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1491396. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Insulin injection aspects, such as fear of injection and pain, directly affect glycemic control, patient adherence and quality of life. Use of thinner and shorter needles could increase acceptance of injections. The aim of the study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of the new 34G × 3.5 mm needle compared to a 32G × 4 mm in patients with diabetes treated with insulin.

METHODS

This is an open, randomized, two-period crossover, non-inferiority trial. Every treatment period lasted 3 weeks. Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, treated with multiple daily insulin injections, were randomly assigned to receive a 34G × 3.5 mm or a 32G × 4 mm pen needle. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of the 34G × 3.5 mm in comparison with the 32G × 4 mm pen needle in terms of percentage absolute change of blood fructosamine (% |ΔFru|), using a non-inferiority margin of 20%.

RESULTS

Overall 77 patients were randomized and 73 completed the study. Patients characteristics were: 52% male, 80.5% affected by type 1 diabetes, mean age 52 years (±14.6), mean BMI 24.5 kg/m (±5.6), HbA1c 8% (±1.1) and baseline fructosamine level 350 µmol/l (±84). Mean fructosamine levels increased by 0.56 µmol/l with the 34G needle, while a reduction of 7.29 μmol/l was documented with the 32G needle. The difference between the two groups (7.84 μmol/l) was not statistically significant (p = .27). The % |ΔFru| between the two groups was 7.55% (95% CI 5.67-9.44), meeting the non-inferiority criterion. Glycemic variability, expressed as standard deviation of fasting blood glucose and post-prandial glucose, was not different between the two treatment groups (p = .63 and p = .77, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The 34G × 3.5 mm needle was non-inferior to the 32G × 4 mm needle regarding fructosamine levels and glycemic variability supporting the suitability of the 34G × 3.5 mm needle for insulin injection in patients with diabetes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02690467.

摘要

目的

胰岛素注射的各个方面,如注射恐惧和疼痛,直接影响血糖控制、患者的依从性和生活质量。使用更细和更短的针头可以提高患者对注射的接受程度。本研究的目的是评估新型 34G×3.5mm 针与 32G×4mm 针在接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中的非劣效性。

方法

这是一项开放、随机、两周期交叉、非劣效性试验。每个治疗期持续 3 周。1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者,接受多次每日胰岛素注射治疗,随机分配接受 34G×3.5mm 或 32G×4mm 笔式针。主要终点是使用 20%的非劣效性边界,比较 34G×3.5mm 与 32G×4mm 笔式针在血果糖胺(% |ΔFru|)的绝对变化百分比方面的非劣效性。

结果

共 77 名患者随机分组,73 名患者完成了研究。患者特征为:52%为男性,80.5%患有 1 型糖尿病,平均年龄 52 岁(±14.6),平均 BMI 24.5kg/m(±5.6),HbA1c 8%(±1.1),基线果糖胺水平为 350μmol/l(±84)。使用 34G 针时,果糖胺水平平均升高 0.56μmol/l,而使用 32G 针时则降低 7.29μmol/l。两组之间的差异(7.84μmol/l)无统计学意义(p=0.27)。两组之间的% |ΔFru|为 7.55%(95%CI 5.67-9.44),符合非劣效性标准。空腹血糖和餐后血糖的血糖变异性,以标准差表示,在两组治疗之间无差异(p=0.63 和 p=0.77)。

结论

34G×3.5mm 针在果糖胺水平和血糖变异性方面与 32G×4mm 针无差异,支持 34G×3.5mm 针在糖尿病患者胰岛素注射中的适用性。

临床试验注册

NCT02690467。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验