• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周区前列腺癌中Gleason评分与磁共振扩散张量成像的相关性

Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

作者信息

Li Liang, Margolis Daniel J A, Deng Ming, Cai Jie, Yuan Ling, Feng Zhaoyan, Min Xiangde, Hu Zhiquan, Hu Daoyu, Liu Jihong, Wang Liang

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):460-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24813. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.24813
PMID:25469909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate tumor aggressiveness in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) by correlating Gleason score (GS) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla (T).

METHODS

Eighty-three patients with pathological proven peripheral zone PCa whose GS in at least one core biopsy met the criteria(GS ≤3+3, GS 3+4, GS 4+3, or GS ≥4+4) were included in this study. DTI was performed using b values of 0 and 800 s/mm(2) with 32 directions in all patients on a 3.0T MRI scanner. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated from the DTI data of patients with the previously mentioned four categories of Gleason scores. An association between DTI measurements(FA, ADC) and GS was tested using the Spearman rank correlation analysis.

RESULTS

FA values in the sextants found to harbor cancer were positively correlated with the GS(r = 0.48; P < 0.001), while the ADC values were negatively correlated with GS(r = -0.54; P < 0.001). Statistical significance(P < 0.05) was found for FA values among different GS groups, with the exception of GS 3+4 versus GS 4+3 (P = 0.105). The differences between the ADC values were statistically significant for all four different scores(all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative DTI at 3.0T MRI shows a significant association with GS in the evaluation of tumor aggressiveness in peripheral zone PCa, which may be useful to ensure concordance of biopsy results and therefore make the appropriate decision in the management of patients with PCa.

摘要

背景

通过将 Gleason 评分(GS)与 3.0 特斯拉(T)多参数磁共振成像(MRI)的扩散张量成像(DTI)相关联,研究外周带前列腺癌(PCa)的肿瘤侵袭性。

方法

本研究纳入了 83 例经病理证实的外周带 PCa 患者,其至少一次穿刺活检的 GS 符合标准(GS≤3 + 3、GS 3 + 4、GS 4 + 3 或 GS≥4 + 4)。所有患者均在 3.0T MRI 扫描仪上使用 b 值为 0 和 800 s/mm² 且具有 32 个方向进行 DTI 检查。从上述四类 Gleason 评分患者的 DTI 数据中计算出分数各向异性(FA)和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。使用 Spearman 秩相关分析测试 DTI 测量值(FA、ADC)与 GS 之间的关联。

结果

发现存在癌症的扇形区域中的 FA 值与 GS 呈正相关(r = 0.48;P < 0.001),而 ADC 值与 GS 呈负相关(r = -0.54;P < 0.001)。除 GS 3 + 4 与 GS 4 + 3 之间(P = 0.105)外,不同 GS 组之间的 FA 值具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有四个不同评分之间的 ADC 值差异均具有统计学意义(所有 P < 0.05)。

结论

3.0T MRI 的定量 DTI 在评估外周带 PCa 的肿瘤侵袭性方面与 GS 显示出显著关联,这可能有助于确保活检结果的一致性,从而在 PCa 患者的管理中做出适当决策。

相似文献

1
Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer.外周区前列腺癌中Gleason评分与磁共振扩散张量成像的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):460-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24813. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
2
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.
3
Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T.使用3.0T扩散加权磁共振成像和三维质子磁共振波谱对前列腺癌侵袭性进行无创评估。
Acta Radiol. 2015 Jan;56(1):121-8. doi: 10.1177/0284185113520311. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
4
Correlation of quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters with prognostic factors in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中定量扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像参数与预后因素的相关性
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014 Oct;58(5):588-94. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12230. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
5
Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.表观扩散系数值在评估前列腺癌侵袭性方面优于经直肠超声引导下的前列腺活检。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Feb;58(2):232-239. doi: 10.1177/0284185116639764. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla.3.0特斯拉前列腺扩散张量成像
Acta Radiol. 2011 Sep 1;52(7):813-7. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100487. Epub 2011 May 17.
7
The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.表观扩散系数(ADC)、T2信号强度以及这两个参数的组合在评估已知前列腺癌患者的 Gleason 评分和主要 Gleason 分级中的价值。
Acta Radiol. 2016 Jan;57(1):107-14. doi: 10.1177/0284185114561915. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
8
Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T.外周带前列腺癌的检测:3.0T磁共振扩散张量成像、定量动态对比增强磁共振成像及两种技术联合应用的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Mar;55(2):239-47. doi: 10.1177/0284185113494978. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
9
Washout gradient in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is associated with tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer.动态对比增强 MRI 的洗脱梯度与前列腺癌的肿瘤侵袭性相关。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Oct;36(4):912-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23723. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
10
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.扩散加权成像和扩散张量成像中扩散参数对乳腺病变诊断性能的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Study on Patient-specific Computational Forecasting of Prostate Cancer Growth during Active Surveillance Using an Imaging-informed Biomechanistic Model.基于影像组学的生物力学模型对主动监测期间前列腺癌生长进行个体化计算预测的初步研究
Cancer Res Commun. 2024 Mar 1;4(3):617-633. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0449.
2
Computational homogenization of histological microstructures in human prostate tissue: Heterogeneity, anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry.人体前列腺组织中组织微观结构的计算均匀化:非均质性、各向异性和拉压不对称性。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2023 Nov;39(11):e3758. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3758. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
3
Acquisition Parameters Influence Diffusion Metrics Effectiveness in Probing Prostate Tumor and Age-Related Microstructure.
采集参数对扩散指标探测前列腺肿瘤及与年龄相关微观结构的有效性有影响。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 20;13(5):860. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050860.
4
Prospective evaluation of PI-RADS v2 and quantitative MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in Indian men - East meets West.PI-RADS v2与定量MRI在印度男性临床显著性前列腺癌检测中的前瞻性评估——东方与西方的交汇
Arab J Urol. 2022 May 15;20(3):126-136. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2072141. eCollection 2022.
5
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study.多参数磁共振成像、镓前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描以及各自的定量参数在中高危组患者临床显著性前列腺癌检测与定位中的应用:一项印度人群研究
Indian J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;36(4):362-370. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
6
Identification of prostate cancer using multiparametric MR imaging characteristics of prostate tissues referenced to whole mount histopathology.基于全器官切片病理的前列腺组织磁共振多参数成像特征鉴别前列腺癌。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;85:251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
7
Diffusion and quantification of diffusion of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的扩散与定量分析。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210653. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210653. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
8
Usefulness of readout-segmented EPI-based diffusion tensor imaging of lacrimal gland for detection and disease staging in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.基于读出分段 EPI 的泪腺扩散张量成像在甲状腺相关眼病中的应用及疾病分期评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02044-9.
9
Mapping prostatic microscopic anisotropy using linear and spherical b-tensor encoding: A preliminary study.使用线性和球形 b-张量编码对前列腺微观各向异性进行映射:初步研究。
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Oct;86(4):2025-2033. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28856. Epub 2021 May 31.
10
Clinical application and progress of quantitative functional magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer.前列腺癌定量功能磁共振成像的临床应用及进展。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Apr 28;46(4):414-420. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.200316.