Suppr超能文献

扩散加权成像和扩散张量成像中扩散参数对乳腺病变诊断性能的比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.

机构信息

Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 41380 Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the diffusion parameters measured by conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for discrimination of malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and the normal breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 52 women with 55 breast lesions (30 malignant, 25 benign). DTI and DWI were performed complementary to dynamic contrast MRI at 3T. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of DWI, mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values of DTI were measured for lesions and contralateral breast parenchyma in each patient. We used b factors of 0, 50, 850, 1000 and 1500 s/mm(2) for DWI and b 0 and 1000 s/mm(2) for DTI. ADC, MD and FA values were compared between malignant and benign lesions, and the normal parenchyma by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Diffusion parameters showed no difference according to menopausal status in the normal breast. ADC and MD values of the malignant lesions were significantly lower than benign lesions and normal parenchyma (p=0.001). The FA showed no statistical significance. With the cut-off values of ≤ 1.23 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (b 0-1000 s/mm(2)) and ≤ 1.12 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (b 0-1500 s/mm(2)), ADC showed 92.85% and 96.15% sensitivity; 72.22% and 73.52% PPV, respectively. With a cut-off value of ≤ 1.27 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (b 1000 s/mm(2)), MD was 100% sensitive with a PPV of 65.90%. Comparing the diagnostic performance of the parameters in DTI with DWI, we obtained similar efficiency of ADC with b values of 0,1000 and 0,1500 s/mm(2) and MD with a b value of 0, 1000 s/mm(2) (AUC = 0.82 ± 0.07).

CONCLUSION

ADC of DWI and MD of DTI values provide significant discriminative factors for benign and malignant breast lesions. FA measurement was not discriminative. Supported with clinical and dynamic contrast MRI findings, DWI and DTI findings provide significant contribution to the final radiologic decision.

摘要

目的

评估常规弥散加权成像(DWI)和弥散张量成像(DTI)测量的扩散参数对鉴别乳腺良恶性病变及正常乳腺的诊断效能。

材料与方法

本研究纳入 52 例 55 个乳腺病变患者(30 个恶性,25 个良性)。所有患者均在 3T 磁共振仪上进行 DWI 和动态对比增强 MRI 检查。对每位患者的病变和对侧乳腺实质进行 DWI 及 DTI 的表观弥散系数(ADC)、平均弥散系数(MD)和各向异性分数(FA)值的测量。DWI 时 b 值采用 0、50、850、1000 和 1500 s/mm2,DTI 时 b 值采用 0 和 1000 s/mm2。通过单因素和多因素分析比较良恶性病变与正常乳腺之间的 ADC、MD 和 FA 值的差异。

结果

在正常乳腺中,弥散参数不受绝经状态的影响。恶性病变的 ADC 和 MD 值显著低于良性病变和正常乳腺(p=0.001),FA 值无统计学差异。在 ADC 值截断值为≤1.23×10(-3)mm(2)/s(b 0-1000 s/mm(2))和≤1.12×10(-3)mm(2)/s(b 0-1500 s/mm(2))时,ADC 的灵敏度分别为 92.85%和 96.15%,PPV 分别为 72.22%和 73.52%。当 MD 值的截断值为≤1.27×10(-3)mm(2)/s(b 1000 s/mm(2))时,MD 具有 100%的灵敏度和 65.90%的 PPV。与 DWI 比较,DTI 参数的诊断效能类似,ADC 值的 b 值分别为 0、1000 和 0、1500 s/mm(2),MD 值的 b 值为 0、1000 s/mm(2)时,具有相似的 AUC(AUC=0.82±0.07)。

结论

DWI 的 ADC 值和 DTI 的 MD 值为乳腺良恶性病变提供了有意义的鉴别因素,FA 值无鉴别意义。结合临床和动态对比增强 MRI 表现,DWI 和 DTI 结果对最终影像学决策有重要贡献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验