Department of Neurology, Yale Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Epilepsia. 2014 Dec;55(12):1986-95. doi: 10.1111/epi.12851. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
To study the incidence, spatial distribution, and signal characteristics of high frequency oscillations (HFOs) outside the epileptic network.
We included patients who underwent invasive evaluations at Yale Comprehensive Epilepsy Center from 2012 to 2013, had all major lobes sampled, and had localizable seizure onsets. Segments of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep prior to the first seizure were analyzed. We implemented a semiautomated process to analyze oscillations with peak frequencies >80 Hz (ripples 80-250 Hz; fast ripples 250-500 Hz). A contact location was considered epileptic if it exhibited epileptiform discharges during the intracranial evaluation or was involved ictally within 5 s of seizure onset; otherwise it was considered nonepileptic.
We analyzed recordings from 1,209 electrode contacts in seven patients. The nonepileptic contacts constituted 79.1% of the total number of contacts. Ripples constituted 99% of total detections. Eighty-two percent of all HFOs were seen in 45.2% of the nonepileptic contacts (82.1%, 47%, 34.6%, and 34% of the occipital, parietal, frontal, and temporal nonepileptic contacts, respectively). The following sublobes exhibited physiologic HFOs in all patients: Perirolandic, basal temporal, and occipital subregions. The ripples from nonepileptic sites had longer duration, higher amplitude, and lower peak frequency than ripples from epileptic sites. A high HFO rate (>1/min) was seen in 110 nonepileptic contacts, of which 68.2% were occipital. Fast ripples were less common, seen in nonepileptic parietooccipital regions only in two patients and in the epileptic mesial temporal structures.
There is consistent occurrence of physiologic HFOs over vast areas of the neocortex outside the epileptic network. HFOs from nonepileptic regions were seen in the occipital lobes and in the perirolandic region in all patients. Although duration of ripples and peak frequency of HFOs are the most effective measures in distinguishing pathologic from physiologic events, there was significant overlap between the two groups.
研究癫痫网络外高频振荡(HFOs)的发生率、空间分布和信号特征。
我们纳入了 2012 年至 2013 年在耶鲁综合癫痫中心接受侵袭性评估的患者,所有主要脑叶均有样本采集,并具有可定位的发作起始。分析首次发作前非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠的片段。我们实施了一种半自动过程来分析峰值频率>80 Hz 的振荡(锐波 80-250 Hz;快锐波 250-500 Hz)。如果一个接触点在颅内评估期间表现出癫痫样放电,或者在发作起始后 5 秒内参与发作,则被认为是癫痫性的;否则,被认为是非癫痫性的。
我们分析了来自 7 名患者的 1209 个电极接触的记录。非癫痫性接触点构成了总接触点的 79.1%。锐波构成了总检测的 99%。所有 HFO 中,82%见于 45.2%的非癫痫性接触点(分别为 82.1%、47%、34.6%和 34%的枕叶、顶叶、额叶和颞叶非癫痫性接触点)。以下亚区在所有患者中均显示出生理性 HFOs:旁中央区、基底颞叶和枕叶亚区。来自非癫痫性部位的锐波具有比来自癫痫性部位的锐波更长的持续时间、更高的振幅和更低的峰值频率。在 110 个非癫痫性接触点中观察到高 HFO 率(>1/min),其中 68.2%为枕叶。快锐波较少见,仅在 2 名患者的非癫痫性顶枕叶区和癫痫性内侧颞叶结构中可见。
在癫痫网络外的新皮质大片区持续存在生理性 HFOs。所有患者的枕叶和旁中央区都可见来自非癫痫区的 HFOs。虽然锐波的持续时间和 HFO 的峰值频率是区分病理性和生理性事件的最有效措施,但两组之间存在显著重叠。