Polk Deborah E, Kim Sunghee, Manz Michael, Weyant Robert J
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;43(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12135. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
To determine whether there is an Appalachian disparity in caries prevalence or extent in children living in Pennsylvania.
We conducted a cross-sectional clinical assessment of caries in a sample representing 1st, 3rd, 9th, and 11th grade students across Pennsylvania. We used logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression controlling for age to examine the association of residence in an Appalachian county with caries prevalence and extent in the primary and permanent dentitions.
Compared with children living outside Appalachia, more children living in Appalachia had a dft >0 (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.07-1.76) and more had a DMFT >0 (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.06-1.64). In addition, compared with children living outside Appalachia, children living in Appalachia had a greater primary but not permanent caries extent (IRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19).
We found Appalachian disparities in caries prevalence in both the primary and permanent dentitions and an Appalachian disparity in caries extent in the primary dentition. None of the disparities was moderated by age. This suggests that the search for the mechanism or mechanisms for the Appalachian disparities should focus on differential exposures to risk factors occurring prior to and at the start of elementary school.
确定宾夕法尼亚州儿童的龋齿患病率或严重程度是否存在阿巴拉契亚地区差异。
我们对宾夕法尼亚州1年级、3年级、9年级和11年级学生的样本进行了龋齿横断面临床评估。我们使用逻辑回归和零膨胀负二项回归,并控制年龄,以研究居住在阿巴拉契亚县与乳牙列和恒牙列龋齿患病率及严重程度之间的关联。
与居住在阿巴拉契亚地区以外的儿童相比,居住在阿巴拉契亚地区的儿童中,更多儿童的乳牙龋失补牙数(dft)>0(比值比[OR]=1.37,95%置信区间[CI]=1.07-1.76),更多儿童的恒牙龋失补牙数(DMFT)>0(OR=1.32,95%CI=1.06-1.64)。此外,与居住在阿巴拉契亚地区以外的儿童相比,居住在阿巴拉契亚地区的儿童乳牙龋齿严重程度更高,但恒牙龋齿严重程度无差异(发病率比[IRR]=1.10,95%CI=1.01-1.19)。
我们发现乳牙列和恒牙列的龋齿患病率存在阿巴拉契亚地区差异,乳牙列的龋齿严重程度也存在阿巴拉契亚地区差异。这些差异均不受年龄影响。这表明,寻找阿巴拉契亚地区差异的机制应侧重于小学入学前及入学初期接触危险因素的差异。