Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;49(5):427-436. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12618. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
This cross-sectional study assessed differences in oral health and related behaviours and risk indicators by rurality in a north-central Appalachian population using the Andersen behavioural model as a conceptual framework.
Participants were residents aged 18-59 years (n = 1311) from the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia, selected according to a household-based sampling strategy. Rural-Urban Continuum codes (RUC) corresponding to the participants' residences were used to classify participants as rural or urban. Mixed models were used to test rural-urban differences in measures of oral health, related behaviours, and need, enabling, and predisposing risk indicators. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic variables: age, sex, race, income, perceived socioeconomic status, educational attainment and dental insurance.
Rural residents had poorer oral health overall, with fewer sound teeth (β = -1.79), more dental caries (β = 0.27) and higher rates of edentulism (5.2% vs 2.8%). Differences also were observed for dental care utilization and perceived barriers to care. Rural residents were less likely to attend dental visits as often as needed (26.9% vs 42.8%) and were more prone to seek care only after experiencing a dental problem (64.3% vs 43.9%). Rural residents also were more likely to report high costs (89% vs 62.6%) as a major reason for not having dental visits. Rural-urban differences for some oral health characteristics and behaviours could be explained by sociodemographic characteristics, whereas others could not.
This study revealed rural-urban differences in risk indicators and oral health outcomes in north-central Appalachia. Many of these differences were explained, completely or partly, by sociodemographic factors.
本横断面研究采用安德森行为模型作为概念框架,评估了北阿巴拉契亚地区人群的农村与城市人口在口腔健康和相关行为及风险指标方面的差异。
该研究的参与者为年龄在 18-59 岁之间的中心口腔健康研究 Appalachia 的居民(n=1311),他们是根据基于家庭的抽样策略选择的。参与者居住的农村-城市连续体代码(RUC)用于将参与者分类为农村或城市。混合模型用于检验口腔健康、相关行为以及需要、促进和倾向风险指标方面的城乡差异。模型调整了社会人口统计学变量:年龄、性别、种族、收入、感知社会经济地位、教育程度和牙齿保险。
农村居民的口腔健康总体较差,有更多的缺牙(β=-1.79)、更多的龋齿(β=0.27)和更高的失牙率(5.2% vs 2.8%)。在牙科保健利用率和对保健的认知障碍方面也存在差异。农村居民更不可能按照需要的频率定期看牙医(26.9% vs 42.8%),更倾向于在出现牙齿问题后才寻求治疗(64.3% vs 43.9%)。农村居民也更有可能将高额费用(89% vs 62.6%)作为不进行牙科治疗的主要原因。一些口腔健康特征和行为的城乡差异可以用社会人口统计学特征来解释,而其他差异则不能。
本研究揭示了北阿巴拉契亚地区农村与城市人口在风险指标和口腔健康结果方面的差异。这些差异中的许多可以完全或部分地用社会人口统计学因素来解释。