Luke Douglas A, Carothers Bobbi J, Dhand Amar, Bell Ryan A, Moreland-Russell Sarah, Sarli Cathy C, Evanoff Bradley A
Center for Public Health Systems Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):143-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12248. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
The importance of transdisciplinary collaboration is growing, though not much is known about how to measure collaboration patterns. The purpose of this paper is to present multiple ways of mapping and evaluating the growth of cross-disciplinary partnerships over time. Social network analysis was used to examine the impact of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) on collaboration patterns. Grant submissions from 2007 through 2010 and publications from 2007 through 2011 of Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS) members were examined. A Cohort Model examining the first-year ICTS members demonstrated an overall increase in collaborations on grants and publications, as well as an increase in cross-discipline collaboration as compared to within-discipline. A Growth Model that included additional members over time demonstrated the same pattern for grant submissions, but a decrease in cross-discipline collaboration as compared to within-discipline collaboration for publications. ICTS members generally became more cross-disciplinary in their collaborations during the CTSA. The exception of publications for the Growth Model may be due to the time lag between funding and publication, as well as pressure for younger scientists to publish in their own fields. Network analysis serves as a valuable tool for evaluating changes in scientific collaboration.
跨学科合作的重要性日益凸显,不过对于如何衡量合作模式,人们所知甚少。本文旨在介绍多种方法,用于描绘和评估跨学科伙伴关系随时间的发展情况。社会网络分析被用于研究临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)对合作模式的影响。研究了临床与转化科学研究所(ICTS)成员在2007年至2010年期间的资助申请以及在2007年至2011年期间的出版物。一项针对ICTS第一年成员的队列模型显示,资助和出版物方面的合作总体有所增加,且跨学科合作相较于学科内合作也有所增加。一个随时间纳入更多成员的增长模型在资助申请方面呈现出相同模式,但在出版物方面,与学科内合作相比,跨学科合作有所减少。在CTSA期间,ICTS成员在合作中总体上变得更加跨学科。增长模型中出版物出现例外情况,可能是由于资助与出版之间的时间差,以及年轻科学家在自己领域发表论文的压力。网络分析是评估科学合作变化的宝贵工具。