• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breaking down silos: mapping growth of cross-disciplinary collaboration in a translational science initiative.打破壁垒:绘制跨学科合作在一项转化科学计划中的发展轨迹。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):143-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12248. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Academic Cross-Pollination: The Role of Disciplinary Affiliation in Research Collaboration.学术交叉融合:学科归属在研究合作中的作用
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0145916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145916. eCollection 2016.
3
Social network analysis to assess the impact of the CTSA on biomedical research grant collaboration.运用社交网络分析评估临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)对生物医学研究资助合作的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):150-4. doi: 10.1111/cts.12247. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
4
Designing a CTSA-Based Social Network Intervention to Foster Cross-Disciplinary Team Science.设计基于临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的社交网络干预措施以促进跨学科团队科学
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):281-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12267. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Forging a link between mentoring and collaboration: a new training model for implementation science.建立指导与合作之间的联系:一种实施科学的新培训模式。
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 13;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0499-y.
6
Networks of Collaboration among Scientists in a Center for Diabetes Translation Research.糖尿病转化研究中心科学家之间的合作网络。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0136457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136457. eCollection 2015.
7
Scope, Influence, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Publication Portfolio of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2017.范围、影响与跨学科合作:2006年至2017年美国国立卫生研究院临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目的出版物组合
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):169-179. doi: 10.1177/0163278719839435. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
9
Social network analysis of biomedical research collaboration networks in a CTSA institution.对一所临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)机构的生物医学研究合作网络进行社会网络分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:130-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
Global scientific collaboration in COPD research.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)研究中的全球科学合作。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jan 6;12:215-225. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S124051. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Support of Underrepresented and Early-Stage Faculty at a Research Center for Minority Institutions: A Social Network Analysis of Research Productivity over a Five-Year Period.少数族裔机构研究中心对代表性不足和早期教职员工的支持:五年研究生产力的社会网络分析
Innov High Educ. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s10755-025-09794-0.
2
The Affective Science Network: A Fieldwide Map of over 1 Million Citations.情感科学网络:超过100万条引文的全领域图谱。
Affect Sci. 2025 Feb 1;6(2):321-339. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00292-8. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Connecting chemical worlds for a sustainable future.连接化学世界,共创可持续未来。
Chem Sci. 2024 Feb 28;15(14):5056-5060. doi: 10.1039/d3sc06815c. eCollection 2024 Apr 3.
4
Bibliometric and social network analysis of a Clinical and Translational Resource awardee: An Oklahoma experience 2014-2021.临床与转化资源获奖者的文献计量学与社会网络分析:俄克拉荷马州2014 - 2021年的经验
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec 7;8(1):e10. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.690. eCollection 2024.
5
A community effort in SARS-CoV-2 drug discovery.社区在 SARS-CoV-2 药物研发中的努力。
Mol Inform. 2024 Jan;43(1):e202300262. doi: 10.1002/minf.202300262. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
A mixed-methods analysis to understand the implementation of a multistakeholder research consortium: Environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO).一项旨在了解多利益相关方研究联盟实施情况的混合方法分析:环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 29;7(1):e198. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.620. eCollection 2023.
7
Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach.大型研究合作中的协作与发展:网络分析方法。
Eval Program Plann. 2024 Feb;102:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102375. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
8
Development of a clinical and translational research curriculum for undergraduate students.面向本科生的临床与转化研究课程的开发。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 2;7(1):e118. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.532. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating the impact of a CTSA program from 2008 to 2021 through bibliometrics, social network analysis, and altmetrics.通过文献计量学、社会网络分析和替代计量学评估2008年至2021年CTSA项目的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 11;7(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.530. eCollection 2023.
10
Cross-sector co-creation of a community-based physical activity program for breast cancer survivors in Colombia.哥伦比亚基于社区的乳腺癌幸存者身体活动项目的跨部门共同创造。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac073.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the evolution and output of cross-disciplinary collaborations within the NCI Physical Sciences-Oncology Centers Network.衡量美国国立癌症研究所物理科学-肿瘤学中心网络内跨学科合作的发展与产出。
Res Eval. 2013 Dec;22(5):285-297. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvt025.
2
The growth and impact of Alzheimer disease centers as measured by social network analysis.基于社会网络分析的阿尔茨海默病中心的发展和影响。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Apr;71(4):412-20. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.6225.
3
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.绘制团队科学学科的研究议程。
Res Eval. 2011 Jun 1;20(2):145-158. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580.
4
Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents.系统科学方法在公共卫生领域的应用:动态、网络和主体。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:357-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
5
Network dynamics to evaluate performance of an academic institution.网络动力学评估学术机构的绩效。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Oct 13;2(53):53ps49. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001580.
6
A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.多层次系统视角的团队科学研究。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
7
ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.ergm:一个用于拟合、模拟和诊断网络指数族模型的软件包。
J Stat Softw. 2008 May 1;24(3):nihpa54860. doi: 10.18637/jss.v024.i03.
8
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
9
The National Cancer Institute's transdisciplinary centers initiatives and the need for building a science of team science.美国国立癌症研究所的跨学科中心计划以及构建团队科学学科的必要性。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.012.
10
Transdisciplinarity among tobacco harm-reduction researchers: a network analytic approach.烟草危害减少研究人员之间的跨学科性:一种网络分析方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.015.

打破壁垒:绘制跨学科合作在一项转化科学计划中的发展轨迹。

Breaking down silos: mapping growth of cross-disciplinary collaboration in a translational science initiative.

作者信息

Luke Douglas A, Carothers Bobbi J, Dhand Amar, Bell Ryan A, Moreland-Russell Sarah, Sarli Cathy C, Evanoff Bradley A

机构信息

Center for Public Health Systems Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):143-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12248. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1111/cts.12248
PMID:25472908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4405428/
Abstract

The importance of transdisciplinary collaboration is growing, though not much is known about how to measure collaboration patterns. The purpose of this paper is to present multiple ways of mapping and evaluating the growth of cross-disciplinary partnerships over time. Social network analysis was used to examine the impact of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) on collaboration patterns. Grant submissions from 2007 through 2010 and publications from 2007 through 2011 of Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS) members were examined. A Cohort Model examining the first-year ICTS members demonstrated an overall increase in collaborations on grants and publications, as well as an increase in cross-discipline collaboration as compared to within-discipline. A Growth Model that included additional members over time demonstrated the same pattern for grant submissions, but a decrease in cross-discipline collaboration as compared to within-discipline collaboration for publications. ICTS members generally became more cross-disciplinary in their collaborations during the CTSA. The exception of publications for the Growth Model may be due to the time lag between funding and publication, as well as pressure for younger scientists to publish in their own fields. Network analysis serves as a valuable tool for evaluating changes in scientific collaboration.

摘要

跨学科合作的重要性日益凸显,不过对于如何衡量合作模式,人们所知甚少。本文旨在介绍多种方法,用于描绘和评估跨学科伙伴关系随时间的发展情况。社会网络分析被用于研究临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)对合作模式的影响。研究了临床与转化科学研究所(ICTS)成员在2007年至2010年期间的资助申请以及在2007年至2011年期间的出版物。一项针对ICTS第一年成员的队列模型显示,资助和出版物方面的合作总体有所增加,且跨学科合作相较于学科内合作也有所增加。一个随时间纳入更多成员的增长模型在资助申请方面呈现出相同模式,但在出版物方面,与学科内合作相比,跨学科合作有所减少。在CTSA期间,ICTS成员在合作中总体上变得更加跨学科。增长模型中出版物出现例外情况,可能是由于资助与出版之间的时间差,以及年轻科学家在自己领域发表论文的压力。网络分析是评估科学合作变化的宝贵工具。