• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多层次系统视角的团队科学研究。

A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.

机构信息

Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center, School of Library and Information Science (SLIS), Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.

出版信息

Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.

DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399
PMID:20844283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3527819/
Abstract

This Commentary describes recent research progress and professional developments in the study of scientific teamwork, an area of inquiry termed the "science of team science" (SciTS, pronounced "sahyts"). It proposes a systems perspective that incorporates a mixed-methods approach to SciTS that is commensurate with the conceptual, methodological, and translational complexities addressed within the SciTS field. The theoretically grounded and practically useful framework is intended to integrate existing and future lines of SciTS research to facilitate the field's evolution as it addresses key challenges spanning macro, meso, and micro levels of analysis.

摘要

本述评描述了科学团队研究领域(亦称“团队科学的科学”)的最新研究进展和专业发展。该领域采用混合方法来研究科学团队,提出了一个系统观点,与团队科学领域所涉及的概念、方法和转化复杂性相匹配。该理论基础扎实且实用的框架旨在整合现有的和未来的团队科学研究路线,以促进该领域的发展,解决跨越宏观、中观和微观分析层面的关键挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/3527819/36b70b3529f9/nihms325982f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/3527819/36b70b3529f9/nihms325982f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/3527819/36b70b3529f9/nihms325982f1.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.多层次系统视角的团队科学研究。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
2
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.绘制团队科学学科的研究议程。
Res Eval. 2011 Jun 1;20(2):145-158. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580.
3
Pearls and Pitfalls of Team Science.团队科学的要点与陷阱
West J Nurs Res. 2019 Jun;41(6):920-940. doi: 10.1177/0193945918793097. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
4
Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature.作为跨专业协作研究实践的团队科学:对团队科学文献的系统综述
J Investig Med. 2017 Jan;65(1):15-22. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000216. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
5
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
6
Enhancing translational team effectiveness: The Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science framework for translating empirically informed strategies into evidence-based interventions.提高转化团队的效能:威斯康星团队科学干预框架,用于将基于实证的策略转化为循证干预措施。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 21;5(1):e158. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.825. eCollection 2021.
7
Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.手术室中有效跨专业团队合作的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0249576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249576. eCollection 2021.
8
The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.团队科学的科学:该领域概述及增刊介绍
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
9
The science of team science: commentary on measurements of scientific readiness.团队科学的科学:关于科学准备度测量的评论
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.016.
10
Measuring the processes of interdisciplinary team collaboration: Creating valid measures using a many-facet Rasch model approach.衡量跨学科团队协作过程:使用多面Rasch模型方法创建有效测量指标。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 6;6(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.472. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.当代研究团队的价值论与动力学:对知识、价值观和社会要素的系统评价与诠释学元分析
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Aug 7;10:1525587. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1525587. eCollection 2025.
2
Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.实施团队MAPPS:一项基于证据的新团队科学干预措施传播与实施研究的形成性定性研究结果
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 10;9(1):e68. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.22. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing the science of team science.推进团队科学的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x.
2
Research agenda. Opportunities for research and NIH.研究议程。研究机会与美国国立卫生研究院。
Science. 2010 Jan 1;327(5961):36-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1185055.
3
Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.多所大学联合研究团队:科学领域中影响力、地域及分层的转变
Brazilian oral medicine and oral pathology: international scientific collaborations.
巴西口腔医学与口腔病理学:国际科学合作
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):e605-e613. doi: 10.4317/medoral.27169.
4
Developing future translational scientists through authentic learning and assessments.通过真实学习和评估培养未来的转化型科学家。
Int J Educ Res Open. 2022;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100151. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
5
Conducting health services research during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences from the veterans health administration.在 COVID-19 大流行期间开展卫生服务研究:退伍军人健康管理局的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):1267. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10296-y.
6
Connected Health Innovation Research Program (C.H.I.R.P.): A bridge for digital health and wellness in cardiology and oncology.互联健康创新研究项目(C.H.I.R.P.):心血管病学和肿瘤学中数字健康与健康管理的桥梁。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Aug;20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100192. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science.科学学中的数据、度量和经验方法。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1046-1058. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01562-4. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
8
Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach.设计和验证一种新的医疗保健系统可用性量表(HSUS)用于临床决策支持系统:一种混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e065323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323.
9
Bringing Together a Transdisciplinary Team to Create and Advance a Shared Vision for Research and Support for Siblings of Youth With Cancer.汇聚跨学科团队,为癌症患儿的兄弟姐妹的研究和支持创建并推进共同愿景。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/27527530221121727. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
10
Relationships between changing communication networks and changing perceptions of psychological safety in a team science setting: Analysis with actor-oriented social network models.团队科学环境中沟通网络变化与心理安全感认知变化之间的关系:基于面向行动者的社会网络模型的分析
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0273899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273899. eCollection 2022.
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158357. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
4
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
5
The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.团队科学的科学:该领域概述及增刊介绍
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
6
The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One evaluation study.跨学科研究团队与中心的合作准备情况:美国国立癌症研究所TREC第一年评估研究的结果
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.035.
7
Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success.跨学科培训:成功的关键要素与先决条件
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.004.
8
Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review.跨学科和多学科研究的评估:一项文献综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010.
9
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
10
Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.迈向跨学科行动研究的一门科学。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):63-77. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5.