Sambo Maganga, Lembo Tiziana, Cleaveland Sarah, Ferguson Heather M, Sikana Lwitiko, Simon Cleophas, Urassa Honorati, Hampson Katie
Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health; Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health; Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine; College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Dec 4;8(12):e3310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003310. eCollection 2014 Dec.
Despite being entirely preventable, canine rabies still kills 55,000 people/year in developing countries. Information about local beliefs and practices can identify knowledge gaps that may affect prevention practices and lead to unnecessary deaths.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated knowledge, attitudes and practices related to rabies and its prevention and control amongst a cross-section of households (n = 5,141) in urban and rural areas of central, southern and northern Tanzania. Over 17% of respondents owned domestic dogs (average of 2.3 dogs/household),>95% had heard about rabies, and>80% knew that rabies is transmitted through dog bites. People who (1) had greater education, (2) originated from areas with a history of rabies interventions, (3) had experienced exposure by a suspect rabid animal, (4) were male and (5) owned dogs were more likely to have greater knowledge about the disease. Around 80% of respondents would seek hospital treatment after a suspect bite, but only 5% were aware of the need for prompt wound cleansing after a bite. Although>65% of respondents knew of dog vaccination as a means to control rabies, only 51% vaccinated their dogs. Determinants of dog vaccination included (1) being a male-headed household, (2) presence of children, (3) low economic status, (4) residing in urban areas, (5) owning livestock, (6) originating from areas with rabies interventions and (7) having purchased a dog. The majority of dog-owning respondents were willing to contribute no more than US$0.31 towards veterinary services.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identified important knowledge gaps related to, and factors influencing the prevention and control of rabies in Tanzania. Increasing knowledge regarding wound washing, seeking post-exposure prophylaxis and the need to vaccinate dogs are likely to result in more effective prevention of rabies; however, greater engagement of the veterinary and medical sectors is also needed to ensure the availability of preventative services.
尽管犬类狂犬病完全可以预防,但在发展中国家,每年仍有55000人死于该病。有关当地信仰和做法的信息可以识别可能影响预防措施并导致不必要死亡的知识空白。
方法/主要发现:我们在坦桑尼亚中部、南部和北部城乡的部分家庭(n = 5141)中调查了与狂犬病及其预防控制相关的知识、态度和做法。超过17%的受访者拥有家养犬(平均每户2.3只狗),超过95%的人听说过狂犬病,超过80%的人知道狂犬病通过狗咬伤传播。(1) 受教育程度较高、(2)来自有狂犬病干预历史地区、(3)曾被疑似狂犬病动物暴露、(4)男性以及(5)养狗的人对该病的了解可能更多。约80%的受访者在被疑似咬伤后会寻求医院治疗,但只有5%的人意识到咬伤后需要及时清洗伤口。尽管超过65%的受访者知道给狗接种疫苗是控制狂犬病的一种方法,但只有51%的人给他们的狗接种了疫苗。给狗接种疫苗的决定因素包括:(1)户主为男性、(2)有孩子、(3)经济地位低、(4)居住在城市地区、(5)拥有牲畜、(6)来自有狂犬病干预的地区以及(7)购买过狗。大多数养狗的受访者愿意为兽医服务贡献不超过0.31美元。
结论/意义:我们确定了坦桑尼亚与狂犬病预防控制相关的重要知识空白以及影响因素。增加关于伤口清洗、寻求暴露后预防和给狗接种疫苗必要性的知识可能会更有效地预防狂犬病;然而,还需要兽医和医疗部门更多地参与,以确保预防服务的可及性。