Di Marzo Vincenzo, Centonze Diego
Endocannabinoid Research Group, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015 Mar;21(3):215-21. doi: 10.1111/cns.12358. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
Regulatory authorities admit clinical studies with an initial enrichment phase to select patients that respond to treatment before randomization (Enriched Design Studies; EDSs). The trial period aims to prevent long-term drug exposure risks in patients with limited chances of improvement while optimizing costs. In EDSs for symptom control therapies providing early improvements and without a wash-out period, it is difficult to show further improvements and thus large therapeutic gains versus placebo. Moreover, in trials with cannabinoids, the therapeutic gains can be further biased in the postenrichment randomized phase because of carryover and other effects. The aims of the present review article are to examine the placebo effects in the enrichment and postenrichment phases of an EDS with Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (THC/CBD) oromucosal spray in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity and to discuss the possible causes of maintained efficacy after randomization in the placebo-allocated patients. The overall mean therapeutic gain of THC/CBD spray over placebo in resistant MS spasticity after 16 weeks can be estimated as a ~1.27-point improvement on the spasticity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; ~-20.1% of the baseline NRS score). We conclude that careful interpretation of the results of EDSs is required, especially when cannabinoid-based medications are being investigated.
监管机构认可在初始富集阶段进行临床研究,以便在随机分组前选择对治疗有反应的患者(富集设计研究;EDSs)。试验期旨在防止改善机会有限的患者面临长期药物暴露风险,同时优化成本。在用于症状控制疗法的EDSs中,这些疗法能提供早期改善且无洗脱期,很难显示出进一步的改善,因此与安慰剂相比难以获得显著的治疗效果。此外,在大麻素试验中,由于残留效应和其他影响,在富集后随机分组阶段治疗效果可能会进一步出现偏差。本综述文章的目的是研究在患有多发性硬化症(MS)痉挛的患者中,使用Δ(9) -四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚(THC/CBD)口腔黏膜喷雾剂的EDS富集阶段和富集后阶段的安慰剂效应,并讨论在随机分组后安慰剂组患者疗效得以维持的可能原因。在16周后,对于耐药性MS痉挛患者,THC/CBD喷雾剂相对于安慰剂的总体平均治疗效果可估计为在痉挛0 - 10数字评定量表(NRS)上提高约1.27分(约为基线NRS评分的 - 20.1%)。我们得出结论,需要谨慎解读EDSs的结果,尤其是在研究基于大麻素的药物时。