Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助输精管复通术的验证

Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal.

作者信息

Kavoussi Parviz K

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Urology, Austin Fertility and Reproductive Medicine, Austin, Texas 78745, USA.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2015 Mar-Apr;17(2):245-7. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.142141.

Abstract

Vasectomy reversal (VR) has traditionally been performed with the operative microscope. Recently, robot assistance has been applied to VR. Retrospective chart review from a single VR center included men who underwent either robot-assisted VR (RAVR) or microsurgical VR (MVR) by a single fellowship trained microsurgeon between 2011 and 2013 and had a 6 weeks postoperative semen analysis. Fifty-two men who were interested in VR were counseled and given the option of RAVR versus MVR. Twenty-seven men elected to have MVR while 25 men elected RAVR. These included vasovasostomies and vasoepididymostomies in both groups, as well as redo VRs in men who had failed previous VR attempts by other surgeons. There was no statistically significant difference between the microsurgical group and the robot-assisted group, respectively, in overall patency rates (89% vs 92%), 6 weeks post-VR mean sperm concentrations (28 million ml-1 vs 26 million ml-1 ) or total motile counts (29 million vs 30 million), or mean operative times (141 min vs 150 min). There was a statistically significant difference in anastomosis time (64 min vs 74 min), however, clinically this only represented a 10 min longer anastomosis time in the early robotic experience, which was found to be decreasing as the case series continued. Transitioning from MVR to RAVR is feasible with comparable outcomes.

摘要

输精管复通术(VR)传统上是在手术显微镜下进行的。最近,机器人辅助技术已应用于输精管复通术。来自单一输精管复通中心的回顾性病历审查纳入了2011年至2013年间由同一位接受过专科培训的显微外科医生进行机器人辅助输精管复通术(RAVR)或显微外科输精管复通术(MVR)且术后6周进行精液分析的男性。52名对输精管复通术感兴趣的男性接受了咨询,并被给予选择RAVR或MVR的机会。27名男性选择进行MVR,而25名男性选择RAVR。两组均包括输精管吻合术和输精管附睾吻合术,以及其他外科医生先前输精管复通术失败后的再次输精管复通术。显微外科组和机器人辅助组在总体通畅率(89%对92%)、输精管复通术后6周平均精子浓度(2800万/ml对2600万/ml)或总活动精子数(2900万对3000万)或平均手术时间(141分钟对150分钟)方面分别无统计学显著差异。然而,吻合时间存在统计学显著差异(64分钟对74分钟),不过在早期机器人手术经验中,临床上这仅代表吻合时间长了10分钟,且随着病例系列的持续发现该时间在减少。从MVR过渡到RAVR是可行的,且结果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6107/4650487/45a7a2975e3a/AJA-17-245-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验