Division of Robotics and Urology, Department of Urology, Winter Haven Hospital, University of Florida, Winter Haven, Florida 33881, USA.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012 Sep;28(7):435-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315788. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a technically demanding procedure. Previous studies have shown the possible benefit of robotic assistance during such procedures. Our goal was to compare robotic assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy (MVV) and vasoepididymostomy (MVE). The use of robotic assistance for vasectomy reversal may provide the microsurgeon with improved visualization, elimination of tremor, and decreased fatigue and obviate the need for a skilled microsurgical assistant. This study provides the first clinical prospective control trial of robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal. The use of robotic assistance in microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy may have benefit over MVV and MVE with regards to decreasing operative duration and improving the rate of recovery of postoperative total motile sperm counts based on our study.
显微输精管复通术是一项技术要求很高的手术。既往研究显示,机器人辅助在这类手术中可能具有一定优势。我们的目标是比较机器人辅助输精管-输精管吻合术和输精管-附睾吻合术与标准的显微输精管吻合术(MVV)和输精管-附睾吻合术(MVE)。在输精管复通术中使用机器人辅助可能为显微外科医生提供更好的可视化、消除震颤、减少疲劳,并避免对熟练的显微外科助手的需求。本研究首次对机器人辅助与纯显微输精管复通术进行了前瞻性对照临床试验。根据我们的研究,在显微输精管-输精管吻合术和输精管-附睾吻合术中使用机器人辅助可能比 MVV 和 MVE 具有减少手术时间和提高术后总活动精子计数恢复率的优势。