Fujii Masanori, Nakamura Tetsuro, Hara Toshihiko, Nakashima Yasuharu, Iwamoto Yukihide
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kyushu Hospital, 1-8-1 Kishinoura, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 806-8501, Japan,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2056-66. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4084-x. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Although radiographic coxa profunda has been considered an indicator of acetabular overcoverage, recent studies suggest that radiographic coxa profunda is a nonspecific finding seen even in hip dysplasia. The morphologic features of coxa profunda in hip dysplasia and the frequency with which the two overlap are not well defined.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) the prevalence of radiographic coxa profunda in patients with hip dysplasia; (2) the morphologic differences of the acetabulum and pelvis between patients with hip dysplasia and control subjects; and (3) the morphologic differences between hip dysplasia with and without coxa profunda.
We retrospectively reviewed the pelvic radiographs and CT scans of 70 patients (70 hips) with hip dysplasia. Forty normal hips were used as controls. Normal hips were defined as those with a lateral center-edge angle between 25° and 40°. Coxa profunda was defined as present when the acetabular fossa was observed to touch or was medial to the ilioischial line on an AP pelvic radiograph. CT measurements included acetabular version, acetabular coverage, acetabular depth, and rotational alignment of the innominate bone.
The prevalence of coxa profunda was 44% (31 of 70 hips) in dysplastic hips and 73% (29 of 40 hips) in the control hips (odds ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.43-7.68). Dysplastic hips had a more anteverted and globally shallow acetabulum with inwardly rotated innominate bone compared with the control hips (p < 0.001). Dysplastic hips with coxa profunda had a more anteverted acetabulum (p < 0.001) and inwardly rotated innominate bone (p < 0.002) compared with those without coxa profunda, whereas the acetabular coverage and depth did not differ between the two groups, with the numbers available.
Radiographic coxa profunda was not a sign of increased acetabular coverage and depth in patients with hip dysplasia, but rather indicates classic acetabular dysplasia, defined by an anteverted acetabulum with anterolateral acetabular deficiency and an inwardly rotated pelvis. Thus, the presence of coxa profunda does not indicate a disease in addition to hip dysplasia, and the conventional maneuvers during periacetabular osteotomy are adequate for these patients.
Level IV, diagnostic study.
尽管影像学上的髋臼过深被认为是髋臼覆盖增加的一个指标,但最近的研究表明,影像学上的髋臼过深是一种非特异性表现,甚至在髋关节发育不良中也可见到。髋关节发育不良中髋臼过深的形态学特征以及两者重叠的频率尚未明确界定。
问题/目的:我们确定了(1)髋关节发育不良患者中影像学髋臼过深的患病率;(2)髋关节发育不良患者与对照组之间髋臼和骨盆的形态学差异;(3)伴有和不伴有髋臼过深的髋关节发育不良之间的形态学差异。
我们回顾性分析了70例(70髋)髋关节发育不良患者的骨盆X线片和CT扫描。40个正常髋关节作为对照。正常髋关节定义为外侧中心边缘角在25°至40°之间的髋关节。髋臼过深定义为在骨盆前后位X线片上观察到髋臼窝触及或位于髂耻线内侧。CT测量包括髋臼旋转角度、髋臼覆盖度、髋臼深度和无名骨旋转对线。
发育不良髋关节中髋臼过深的患病率为44%(70髋中的31髋),对照组髋关节中为73%(40髋中的29髋)(优势比,3.32;95%可信区间,1.43 - 7.68)。与对照组髋关节相比,发育不良髋关节的髋臼更前倾且整体更浅,无名骨向内旋转(p < 0.001)。与无髋臼过深的发育不良髋关节相比,有髋臼过深的发育不良髋关节髋臼更前倾(p < 0.001),无名骨向内旋转(p < 0.002),而两组之间的髋臼覆盖度和深度在现有数据中无差异。
影像学上的髋臼过深并非髋关节发育不良患者髋臼覆盖度和深度增加的迹象,而是表明典型的髋臼发育不良,其定义为髋臼前倾伴髋臼前外侧缺损以及骨盆向内旋转。因此,髋臼过深的存在并不表明除髋关节发育不良之外的疾病,髋臼周围截骨术中的传统操作对这些患者是足够的。
IV级,诊断性研究。