Suppr超能文献

遗传性乳腺癌检测:基因检测组合还是靶向检测?来自临床癌症遗传学实践的经验

Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer: Panel or Targeted Testing? Experience from a Clinical Cancer Genetics Practice.

作者信息

Doherty Jennifer, Bonadies Danielle C, Matloff Ellen T

机构信息

Cancer Genetic Counseling, Yale Cancer Center/Yale School of Medicine, 55 Church Street, Suite 402, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2015 Aug;24(4):683-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9796-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Abstract

Approaches to hereditary breast cancer testing are shifting as multi-gene panels become more widely available. This paper describes our center's experience and outcomes of a 6-gene panel test as a first-tier approach in patients who were candidates for BRCA testing. Between July and December 2013, a 6-gene panel test was ordered for patients meeting criteria for BRCA testing. A retrospective review detailed the mutation and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) rates for the genes analyzed. The mutation rate was 5.2 % (n = 7) and the VUS rate was 6.7 % (n = 9). A subsequent review determined the number of BRCA-negative patients who would have been offered additional single gene testing had BRCA, only, been their first-tier test. Applying consensus criteria revealed 7.1 % (n = 9) cases that met criteria for additional testing. Pedigree analysis by a certified genetic counselor revealed 26.8 % (n = 34) cases that would have been offered additional testing based on personal and/or family history. Our results suggest that this panel may be warranted as a first-tier test for a small subset of patients, but likely represents over testing for the majority of patients who are candidates for BRCA testing. The genes selected for panels, the extra costs per patient and the chance of VUS must be considered before we uniformly switch from BRCA to full panel testing on all patients.

摘要

随着多基因检测面板的普及,遗传性乳腺癌检测方法正在发生变化。本文描述了我们中心将6基因检测面板作为BRCA检测候选患者的一线检测方法的经验和结果。2013年7月至12月期间,对符合BRCA检测标准的患者进行了6基因检测面板检测。一项回顾性研究详细分析了所检测基因的突变率和意义未明变异(VUS)率。突变率为5.2%(n = 7),VUS率为6.7%(n = 9)。随后的一项研究确定了如果仅将BRCA检测作为一线检测,原本会接受额外单基因检测的BRCA阴性患者数量。应用共识标准显示,7.1%(n = 9)的病例符合额外检测标准。由认证遗传咨询师进行的系谱分析显示,26.8%(n = 34)的病例基于个人和/或家族史会接受额外检测。我们的结果表明,对于一小部分患者,该检测面板作为一线检测可能是必要的,但对于大多数BRCA检测候选患者来说,可能意味着过度检测。在我们对所有患者统一从BRCA检测转向全面检测面板检测之前,必须考虑检测面板所选择的基因、每位患者的额外费用以及VUS的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验