Suppr超能文献

社会工作研究中结构方程模型的系统综述。

A Systematic Review of Structural Equation Modelling in Social Work Research.

作者信息

Guo Baorong, Perron Brian E, Gillespie David F

出版信息

Br J Soc Work. 2009 Dec;39(8):1556-1574. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn101.

Abstract

Structural equation modelling (SEM) is serving an increasingly important role in developing knowledge for the social work profession. Numerous advances have made the software more user-friendly, enabling users to conduct analyses without fully understanding the underlying assumptions or the implications from their analytic decisions. Unlike other fields, there have not been any published reviews in social work research that systematically describe and critique the use of SEM. This study systematically reviewed how SEM is used in social work research and the extent to which it reflects best practices. Thirty-two articles from top-ranked social work journals published from 2001 to 2007 were examined. Of the different types of SEM, the most commonly used was confirmatory factor analysis. Strengths of the research reviewed included examining models and measures not previously tested empirically and generating new insights into old topics through the use of SEM. Weaknesses included significant model modifications without theoretical justification or substantive interpretations. Suggestions are offered for improving applications of SEM in social work research. Specifically, we encourage social work researchers to test competing models, to make model modifications only when theoretically justified, to detail the process of making modifications and to use estimation procedures appropriate to the data.

摘要

结构方程模型(SEM)在社会工作专业知识发展中发挥着越来越重要的作用。众多进展使该软件对用户更加友好,让用户在不完全理解潜在假设或分析决策的影响的情况下就能进行分析。与其他领域不同,社会工作研究中尚未有任何已发表的综述系统地描述和批评SEM的使用情况。本研究系统地回顾了SEM在社会工作研究中的使用方式以及它反映最佳实践的程度。研究了2001年至2007年发表在顶级社会工作期刊上的32篇文章。在不同类型的SEM中,最常用的是验证性因素分析。所审查研究的优点包括检验以前未进行实证检验的模型和测量方法,并通过使用SEM对旧主题产生新的见解。缺点包括在没有理论依据或实质性解释的情况下对模型进行重大修改。文中针对改进SEM在社会工作研究中的应用提出了建议。具体而言,我们鼓励社会工作研究人员检验相互竞争的模型,仅在有理论依据时进行模型修改,详细说明修改过程,并使用适合数据的估计程序。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
A cautionary note on testing latent variable models.关于检验潜在变量模型的警示说明。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 6;6:1715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01715. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验