Krause James S, DiPiro Nicole D, Saunders Lee L, Newman Susan D, Banik Narendra L, Park Sookyoung
Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Spring;20(2):137-46. doi: 10.1310/sci2002-137.
To introduce allostatic load (AL) as a framework for measuring stress-related outcomes after spinal cord injury (SCI) by identifying the number and nature of biomarkers investigated in existing studies and by generating preliminary data on AL in 30 persons with traumatic SCI.
This systematic review and pilot study were conducted at a medical university in the southeastern United States. A review of literature published between 1993 and 2012 identified studies using 2 or more of 5 classes of AL biomarkers. We then collected data on 11 biomarkers (n = 30) from self-selected participants using physical exams and blood and urine specimen collection. These included waist to hip ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, dihydroepiandrosterone, glycosylated hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and cortisol, norepinephrine, and epinephrine normalized by 12-hour creatinine.
We were unable to identify any studies investigating AL biomarkers from each of the 5 areas or any studies specifically proposing to investigate AL. AL scores were relatively low, with metabolic indicators being the most elevated and neuroendocrine the least elevated.
AL is a promising, yet underutilized, construct that may be feasibly assessed after SCI.
通过确定现有研究中所调查生物标志物的数量和性质,并生成30例创伤性脊髓损伤患者的应激负荷初步数据,引入应激负荷(AL)作为衡量脊髓损伤(SCI)后应激相关结果的框架。
本系统评价和试点研究在美国东南部的一所医科大学进行。对1993年至2012年发表的文献进行回顾,确定使用5类AL生物标志物中2种或更多种的研究。然后,我们通过体格检查以及采集血液和尿液样本,收集了11种生物标志物的数据(n = 30),这些生物标志物来自自我选择的参与者。其中包括腰臀比、收缩压和舒张压、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、脱氢表雄酮、糖化血红蛋白、C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、皮质醇、去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素(通过12小时肌酐进行标准化)。
我们未能找到对5个领域中的每一个领域的AL生物标志物进行研究的任何研究,也未找到任何专门提议研究AL的研究。AL得分相对较低,其中代谢指标升高最为明显,神经内分泌指标升高最少。
AL是一个有前景但未得到充分利用的概念,在SCI后可能可以进行可行的评估。